IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS

"Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com> Wed, 24 March 2010 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julienl@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0273A684D for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8CRffYud1UM for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1EC3A67F0 for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=julienl@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1269395638; x=1300931638; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; z=From:=20"Laganier,=20Julien"=20<julienl@qualcomm.com> |To:=20Hui=20Deng=20<denghui02@hotmail.com>,=20"mif@ietf. org"=20<mif@ietf.org>|CC:=20"draft-cao-mif-analysis@tools .ietf.org"=0D=0A=09<draft-cao-mif-analysis@tools.ietf.org >|Date:=20Tue,=2023=20Mar=202010=2018:51:45=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[mif]=20WG=20LC=20for=20MIF=20PS |Thread-Topic:=20[mif]=20WG=20LC=20for=20MIF=20PS |Thread-Index:=20AcrBvZWu5HbsbvsxSjeUT7DflLYnZQJNgDwQ |Message-ID:=20<BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C6AA5685 C@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>|References:=20<COL118-W43D 1A92D6FAECE336508C6B1310@phx.gbl>|In-Reply-To:=20<COL118- W43D1A92D6FAECE336508C6B1310@phx.gbl>|Accept-Language:=20 en-US|Content-Language:=20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach: |X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage:=20en-US |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"iso-8859-1" |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=3600mLMKmCTG4R5a64tXWTpaoso0PeszX971GOIjLjY=; b=UvyAbhp/rV0e2JwyqF+fAiAD0auGtombbmnKppQSLO7kZI1jzX81oz// w6//LHsgJywnVfO9HiPJqZdgaEE0/Iz1qtVScZwlAaFDImeAzr18Ti389 OXiu5liONfBcJ2aRGLr3W4AmWV5QNRrbT6YpYFt1aOA8q2aox08NJ+Ofh A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,5929"; a="37068892"
Received: from ironstorm.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.153]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2010 18:53:57 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,295,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="56468484"
Received: from unknown (HELO nasanexhub04.na.qualcomm.com) ([129.46.134.222]) by ironstorm.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 23 Mar 2010 18:53:32 -0700
Received: from nalasexhc03.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.129.194) by nasanexhub04.na.qualcomm.com (129.46.134.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:51:46 -0700
Received: from NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.7.114]) by nalasexhc03.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.129.194]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:51:46 -0700
From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:51:45 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS
Thread-Index: AcrBvZWu5HbsbvsxSjeUT7DflLYnZQJNgDwQ
Message-ID: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C6AA5685C@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <COL118-W43D1A92D6FAECE336508C6B1310@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL118-W43D1A92D6FAECE336508C6B1310@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-cao-mif-analysis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-cao-mif-analysis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:53:39 -0000

Hello,

Some of us have put together a draft to begin working on the MIF Current Practice Analysis [1]. As a starting point to the analysis, we have re-classified / expanded on the problems listed in earlier version of the problem statement, and communicated that to the authors. Some of our comments were integrated in the last PS draft, but not all.

So my comment towards WGLC is that I'd like the full problem list documented in our draft [1] to be incorporated into the MIF PS. If we can't agree to do that, I'd like to discuss a bit more why some of the problems listed in our drafts were not considered valid.

Thanks.

--julien

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cao-mif-analysis-00

Hui Deng wrote:
>
>
> We appear ready to start the working group last call for our PS documents.  
> This is a two-week WGLC.
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-02.txt
>  
> This is a two week WGLC finishing on March 26.  Please send substantive
> review comments to mif@ietf.org 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> -Hui

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email