Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 04 February 2013 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2247021F8A6C for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:09:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJK6NLILmupN for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:09:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B95621F841F for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so2026148wie.2 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=20LpMRqU9p11e/F2Ejh6OHRw2FO4SykpbPK/jmQ9Wt4=; b=iDYbFF0QCbOj828Hr0ay0nDJo64+Lf2CydwTdUXA01nKPM+nVodNeC1ei8CLn/4+J0 0iXJ/xdmmSQDeMi59HrwGttQc65NUNlsJrzqzKgf/+kBB2h4oCdfGTcCf4q2pKtMXzrW JRzu6sd0xMvlgq1qw117MWnSZiZVcflHVtNoyoRdgH2OAC7Nl+LtQqihw45XzzM8k07F rqkdCiFknWfdgU7jaJ98ZB3Uc3fPEVmz/svDVLp2KT6kSKwpZvui+dZcKdA4u8vO8qAz k6cnLOqDG1Oa0z2KldWbdudBGAb+6cxMdrM+TWL+bPKXCiEE+Pg3GBTDQCvq/FWNSlAp LcWA==
X-Received: by 10.194.239.167 with SMTP id vt7mr11306292wjc.33.1359965342134; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-101-189-53.as13285.net. [2.101.189.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e12sm19893923wiw.5.2013.02.04.00.09.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <510F6C9E.7030300@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:09:02 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <CAM+vMERak2vAoYFeSLRep2xjpm480qPjutyv4-tV=KtU0XO=fw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747479BA9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMETvE==qUZO2_rhyUB+=ChUR4a9CoTCF+q=gBL2cRA+0UA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BB1E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <510E8667.3020608@network-heretics.com> <510E910E.6090806@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BDF8@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <510E9246.1070502@network-heretics.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BEED@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <510E9A8C.6030103@network-heretics.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747C23D@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747C23D@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mif@ietf.org, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Subject: Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:09:04 -0000

On 03/02/2013 18:54, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
>> My proposal is to document the problems as best you can, and make concrete suggestions for areas in which the Internet architecture might be tweaked, but don't try to resolve the conflicts within MIF.   Instead, ask IAB to look at the matter and provide IESG with advice as to how to proceed.
> 
> This isn't bad advice.   It's worth noting that at least one member of the IAB has in fact been participating in the discussion already, however, so it's been my ongoing assumption that this issue is already on their radar, and that if we were doing the wrong thing, we would have heard something about it already.   I say that not to express resistance to your proposal, but simply to observe that I don't think we are _quite_ as far off the rails as you are suggesting.

Although it isn't about this precise problem, I have been banging on
about referrals for several years now (the most recent attempt being at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-referral-ps-02).

I mention this because despite a BOF at IETF76 and at least two IAB members
having showed interest in the problem, no traction has been gained whatever.
I think there's a strong temptation to put this whole topic on the "too hard"
heap, so we (collectively) continue to fiddle with the edges of it,
e.g. expecting DNS server selection to solve the problem.

   Brian