IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 03 February 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0505521F8521 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 07:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.930, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UN5LNhJy28tx for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 07:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A58821F851F for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 07:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF1C20E54 for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:47:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:47:00 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=eoiqr9Tcuff1cNPZIQ60z7 ZmbOk=; b=QFPVbekygktqkaHwbmj7+pk9Wgmdnd7NuSP8ajCYglEIdAE7nYthTF pkEW38mVpdK+ydw8tarvGSd4kbf6JvSTtYULLyrgy5nWA17dD+7TQ47WdrgkrVdt eJXGUfkfOOkx080ZNFtkMkNjNWCzjLZvVYsyYV/r6r4NszL0z2/ro=
X-Sasl-enc: VK3RI1pefDBxZxzHmHGpb/eZ1ZGrz0BWIRj0sNY+zawq 1359906420
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D660848263F; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:46:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <510E8667.3020608@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:46:47 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif@ietf.org
References: <CAM+vMERak2vAoYFeSLRep2xjpm480qPjutyv4-tV=KtU0XO=fw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747479BA9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMETvE==qUZO2_rhyUB+=ChUR4a9CoTCF+q=gBL2cRA+0UA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BB1E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BB1E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:47:02 -0000

On 02/03/2013 10:04 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> This is why when I've discussed this issue in the past, I've always argued that each provisioning domain needs to be treated separately.   We should not look up names in one provisioning domain and use them in another; if we want to try connecting across multiple provisioning domains, we should do DNS lookups on each such provisioning domain, and use the results we get only for connecting within that provisioning domain.
Problem is, this is bad for the Internet architecture, as it basically 
encourages using DNS as a routing protocol.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email