Re: [mif] Call for volunteers about architecture design

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 19/03/2013 16:10, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Except the problem of access discovery and selection, I'm not
>>> sure there are multiple provisioning domains issues with
>>> sequential use of interfaces.
>>
>> I am not sure either.
>
> My take on this, for what it's worth, is that the work MIF is doing
> will be useful, but not central, to what you are trying to do.   MIF
> is focusing on what happens when all the interfaces are on at the
> same time, but we also want to enable the provision sufficient
> functionality that you can set up a connection manager that makes
> choices about which interfaces to keep alive when.
>
> I am not _convinced_ that we need to do a lot of work in that
> space—we may be able to leverage work that IEEE has already done, for
> example, in which case our job would be filling in the gaps that IEEE
> has not already addressed, or getting IEEE to do it, whichever makes
> the most sense.
>
> But the point is that I think you should probably be interested in
> what MIF is doing, but I suspect that the work MIF is doing is not
> crucial to the work you are doing.

I agree.  I am interested in what MIF is doing.

Alex

>
>
>