Re: [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-16.txt

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Fri, 11 March 2016 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697F112DD4E for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:55:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztVQZY8X-MaG for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475C012DC64 for <mile@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id u2BMtFis086636; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:55:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from TakeVaioVJP13 (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id u2BMtFKw086470; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:55:15 +0900 (JST)
From: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: 'Alexey Melnikov' <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "'Roman D. Danyliw'" <rdd@cert.org>
References: <20160201220552.16506.51013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD969F185@marathon> <DBCB2C3E-1AF3-44EB-BBF5-A3B0A46CAF96@isode.com> <56BE0D04.5090307@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <56BE0D04.5090307@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:55:35 +0900
Message-ID: <016501d17be9$1f627e40$5e277ac0$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQHV/ATtfS3BP4PwyT8pNbQxlYraXQHZXyfxAkAx7icB7XgOUJ8bn/Vg
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at zenith1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/71r4AlSumR5GmPSB0cgwF2REiHg>
Cc: mile@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-16.txt
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:55:28 -0000

Hi Roman,

Let me add one more comment.
The schema seems to be fine, but the examples described in the draft need to
be corrected.

The three examples mentioned in Section 7 have <Email> inside <Contact>.
The <Email> elements cannot have string value, according to the Email class
defined in Section 3.9.3, which says we need to use <EmailTo> to describe
the string.

Take


From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 1:49 AM
To: Roman D. Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: mile@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-16.txt

Hi Roman,
A few quick comments after reviewing the most recent diff:


In 2.17:

formatid might need a bit more details. Can you provide some examples?

In 3.9.4:

When one would use "direct" or when "mobile"? Is "direct" referring to a
landline number or something else?


In 3.21:

In EmailHeaderField description: I don't know what is "SMTP header field". I
think you should revert the change to make it "email header field" again.

Also, it should be "zero or more", not "zero or one".

In 3.25.1:

FileType - this is just media type name, right?