Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

"Mohana Jeyatharan" <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com> Wed, 06 May 2009 01:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5863A6997 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 18:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujTih5UZhx6R for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 18:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mei.co.jp (smtp.mei.co.jp [133.183.100.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735353A6A8E for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 18:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw.jp.panasonic.com ([157.8.1.145]) by smtp.mei.co.jp (8.12.11.20060614/3.7W/kc-maile11) with ESMTP id n461U2fJ002093; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:30:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: by mail-gw.jp.panasonic.com (8.11.6p2/3.7W/somlb3) with ESMTP id n461U2s18948; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:30:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: from pslexc01.psl.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jp.panasonic.com (8.11.6p2/3.7W/kc-maili04) with ESMTP id n461U1w18439; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:30:01 +0900 (JST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 09:31:41 +0800
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7235.2
Message-ID: <5F09D220B62F79418461A978CA0921BD0350518A@pslexc01.psl.local>
In-Reply-To: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD1303979E97@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
thread-index: AcnNmNDbMcuRI+dXQmaJ8g/mqcFpSgAUXflA
From: Mohana Jeyatharan <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
To: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>, mip4@ietf.org
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 01:28:41 -0000

Hi all,

I support this work since there is enough interest and also it is very
useful.

BR,
Mohana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> McCann Peter-A001034
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:48 PM
> To: mip4@ietf.org
> Cc: Henrik Levkowetz
> Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
> the multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in
> these two drafts:
> 
> draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
> draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt
> 
> The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these
> two drafts and take the result on as a new work item.
> 
> This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
> respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
> or disagree, and state your reasons why.
> 
> -Pete
> 
> --
> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
>     Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
>      Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/