Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

Qin Wu <sunseawq@huawei.com> Wed, 06 May 2009 06:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sunseawq@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEC13A6A3F for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0BiQiD6I5qyF for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90D63A6D55 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KJ700HOHMVQAU@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 14:47:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.33]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KJ700281MVQYM@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 14:47:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from w53375 ([10.164.12.38]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KJ7005OSMVP4I@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 14:47:50 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:47:49 +0800
From: Qin Wu <sunseawq@huawei.com>
To: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>, mip4@ietf.org
Message-id: <03ed01c9ce16$925e3660$260ca40a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD1303979E97@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 06:49:36 -0000

Since this work does cover multi-homing issues in the mip4 scenario, 
I would like to support this work.

-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
To: <mip4@ietf.org>
Cc: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:47 PM
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support


> Hi, all,
> 
> During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
> the multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in
> these two drafts:
> 
> draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
> draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt
> 
> The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these
> two drafts and take the result on as a new work item.
> 
> This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
> respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
> or disagree, and state your reasons why.
> 
> -Pete
> 
> --
> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
>    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
>     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
>