IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

"McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann@motorola.com> Tue, 05 May 2009 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4433A6CE9 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpOxAukJ2Bs8 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF6A3A70F1 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: pete.mccann@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1241538483!24005100!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 7639 invoked from network); 5 May 2009 15:48:04 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-14.tower-128.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 May 2009 15:48:04 -0000
Received: from il06exr03.mot.com (il06exr03.mot.com [129.188.137.133]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n45Fm3R1008613 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:48:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts01.mot.com (il06vts01.mot.com [129.188.137.141]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id n45Fm3D0024438 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:48:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm67.ds.mot.com (de01exm67.am.mot.com [10.176.8.18]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n45Fm2hP024432 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:48:03 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 11:47:37 -0400
Message-ID: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD1303979E97@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
Thread-Index: AcnNmNDbMcuRI+dXQmaJ8g/mqcFpSg==
From: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
To: mip4@ietf.org
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:46:46 -0000

Hi, all,

During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
the multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in
these two drafts:

draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt

The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these
two drafts and take the result on as a new work item.

This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
or disagree, and state your reasons why.

-Pete

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email