Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

"Kent Leung (kleung)" <kleung@cisco.com> Thu, 07 May 2009 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kleung@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B095A3A6CD2 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ood8sKiwGSoj for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1641128C16D for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,311,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="300273108"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2009 15:51:11 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n47FpBvo015248; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:51:11 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n47FpBZf008239; Thu, 7 May 2009 15:51:11 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.85]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 7 May 2009 08:51:10 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 08:51:10 -0700
Message-ID: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC5208B6AB52@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD1303979E97@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
Thread-Index: AcnNmNDbMcuRI+dXQmaJ8g/mqcFpSgBknv9A
References: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD1303979E97@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
From: "Kent Leung (kleung)" <kleung@cisco.com>
To: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>, mip4@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2009 15:51:10.0987 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4A945B0:01C9CF2B]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1130; t=1241711471; x=1242575471; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kleung@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Kent=20Leung=20(kleung)=22=20<kleung@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Mip4]=20Recharter=3A=20Multiple=20Tunn el=20Support |Sender:=20; bh=EnicDLjSBgzZcG2WIRmGntECAofIKpLTQ4b7TywjfwA=; b=G32YjHOrAT9ccWiHa9ZfvJ5E+HfGxvpRUuRO/2S9as5h6cDkf0WbcXhVy+ x5suyZW5LnwIpPj9axRaSHbrsi+R/LBMAzvP03M0/payZCRyxlbPzOo90Y+W RbpHGcxsMI;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=kleung@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:50:35 -0000

I support this work item because multiple tunnel support is a real-world
use case.

Kent 

-----Original Message-----
From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
McCann Peter-A001034
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:48 AM
To: mip4@ietf.org
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support

Hi, all,

During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on the
multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in these two
drafts:

draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt

The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these two
drafts and take the result on as a new work item.

This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree or
disagree, and state your reasons why.

-Pete
 
--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/