RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode)
"Yoshi Tsuda \(yotsuda\)" <yotsuda@cisco.com> Fri, 27 July 2007 17:28 UTC
Return-path: <mip4-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IETbp-0004Ih-3r; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:28:13 -0400
Received: from mip4 by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IETbn-0004Fd-8k for mip4-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:28:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IETbm-0004FU-VJ for mip4@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:28:10 -0400
Received: from ind-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.104.129.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IETbm-0001Qi-17 for mip4@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:28:10 -0400
Received: from hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com ([10.75.231.163]) by ind-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2007 12:05:26 +0530
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAIfHqUYKS+ej/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,589,1175452200"; d="scan'208"; a="84868261:sNHT39956232"
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com (hkg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.123.94]) by hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6RHS20P029934; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:28:02 +0800
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com [64.104.123.69]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l6RHS1CK025207; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:28:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-hkg-416.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.88]) by xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:28:01 +0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode)
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:27:37 +0800
Message-ID: <35912544FC930E49BF20EF16C3EF2765027A4819@xmb-hkg-416.apac.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520445EAAA@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode)
Thread-Index: AcfP9RTgSQLyB53JQkqB34Jrwl6AwAAdb5sQAAAl9oAAATvVIA==
From: "Yoshi Tsuda (yotsuda)" <yotsuda@cisco.com>
To: "Kent Leung (kleung)" <kleung@cisco.com>, Jun AWANO <j-awano@az.jp.nec.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2007 17:28:01.0179 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B4CB6B0:01C7D073]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2310; t=1185557282; x=1186421282; c=relaxed/simple; s=hkgdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=yotsuda@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Yoshi=20Tsuda=20\(yotsuda\)=22=20<yotsuda@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20pmipv4=20of=20WiMAX=20forum=20(Re=3A=20[Mip4]Question aboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode) |Sender:=20; bh=0jvf9puuiUSA1L5dOtBg2PK6mhDt7t+VMoDoNt6XHNk=; b=XsqbvkkeodKCX+PjjNouJfeD1uQZVMI21r2AjVr9vSgIo5PEkYhpeEW7jP2BcKnadc147Q3q 5Vqu7SE8EIoyOuH0i98OcuBnJ91Xsuo3vXmbK6r15A27OwHqJM+gVn5D7QpPSti2Ax6U9nSBKX PNtE2BtsJ91+d4yM1efzPkGJc=;
Authentication-Results: hkg-dkim-2; header.From=yotsuda@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/hkgdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Cc: mip4 <mip4@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mip4-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Awano-san, What do you think the major technical differences between current Kent's draft and the current WiMAX spec? You know, most people in this MIP4 mailinglist doesn't have enough time to check the specific WiMAX spec. So, we would appreciate, if you point out the MIPv4-related technical differences instead of just saying different. Thanks in advance. -Yoshi > -----Original Message----- > From: Kent Leung (kleung) > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:31 AM > To: Jun AWANO; mip4 > Subject: RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: > [Mip4]Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode) > > Let me clarify that we will be updating our draft, > draft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode, accordingly to address the gaps. > > Kent > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kent Leung (kleung) > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:29 AM > To: Jun AWANO; mip4 > Subject: RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] > Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode) > > Hi Jun. > > We are working with WiMAX Forum members to address the > technical gaps in the draft. Currently, we are collecting > the review comments and will update the draft accordingly. > > Kent > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jun AWANO [mailto:j-awano@az.jp.nec.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:23 PM > To: mip4 > Subject: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Question > aboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode) > > Hi, kent > > Please let me ask about your draft. > > Your draft says, > "This document describes WiMAX Forum and 3GPP2 solution for > the base Proxy Mobile IPv4 function which enables another > entity to provide mobility support on behalf of an unaltered > and mobility-unaware IPv4 device." > > But, I think that the PMIPv4 described in your draft seems > different from the one specified in WiMAX Forum spec (WiMAX > Forum Network Architechture stage2/3). > > Do you plan to change the PMIPv4 spec of WiMAX Forum to match > your draft? > > Best Regards, > Jun > > > -- > Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org > Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 > Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html > Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/ > -- Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
- [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- RE: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… Kent Leung (kleung)
- Re: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- Re: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… John.zhao
- pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Question about … Jun AWANO
- RE: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… Kent Leung (kleung)
- RE: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… Kent Leung (kleung)
- RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Question ab… Kent Leung (kleung)
- RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Questionabo… Kent Leung (kleung)
- RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionabou… Yoshi Tsuda (yotsuda)
- Re: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Questionabo… Jun AWANO
- Re: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionabou… Jun AWANO
- Re: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]Questionabou… Jun AWANO
- Re: [Mip4] Question about draft-leung-mip4-proxy-… Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet