Re: [Mip4] Status update & Recharter effort

Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Thu, 12 February 2009 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6883A6A24 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:08:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.994
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.994 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_PENIS1=3.592, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rO1T+2IYSCDj for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:08:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2743A699A for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:08:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j66so651183rne.18 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:08:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VmJDM/q6qcB0xa/eqZ1nv/vjnqQgY4dIoFb1HUjsyNI=; b=L2PcNNaQeUkn2SDzGJbKAHzQ7a/sB2RFZ/EmzwXC0BtXb8doqEq64rRr/8ljCNDtwB /+u6GB0o1A+Ru/DnkkVwrOpMh/xqDE6jJgFVRLzixFBgszVaKbbR2q5D5nqckqUgk9TT VGUj7QxpxZQGGknywvtJNeYOGxUaQS5BT1AhI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=N63R0osprAa64EG4SlguZmpIVG+Dcy0eAY/utvttO2Ufzgag4SfSNnCQXCrnEiy8SY ViF/kRhL0z1qOg0l6/rlvQtd4AusKZ74xx0n7Trdy88agJXV0lc0SjIcVIbb5YXlfSyT zI3yQEDgC5g/KszsdHEnNg2U68ki0g1pD2sWU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.2.20 with SMTP id e20mr305495wfi.269.1234422508304; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:08:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4c5c7a6d0902112302w7a1167d9kd5b6998090910fe2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD130354B844@de01exm67.ds.mot.com> <4c5c7a6d0902112302w7a1167d9kd5b6998090910fe2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:08:28 +0800
Message-ID: <1d38a3350902112308m1da87176r65c8b0b9d3b34ecc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: Peny Yang <peng.yang.chn@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636e90f8c1c3a900462b36317"
Cc: mip4@ietf.org, McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Status update & Recharter effort
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:08:26 -0000

Hi, Peter

As Peny said here, he is updating to include Henrik's idea to support
broadcast
home forwarding, it will be finished before the submission.

We support your decision.

thanks

-Hui

2009/2/12 Peny Yang <peng.yang.chn@gmail.com>

> Hi, Peter:
>
> > draft-deng-mip4-host-configuration-00.txt
> > draft-chakrabarti-mip4-mcbc-03.txt
> >  These two items are related, because DHCP uses IP-layer broadcast
> >  to deliver DHCPREQUEST messages.  I'd like to propose that we drop
> >  the gen-ext draft and add these two.  Comments?
> [Peny] I agree. And, I am updating the
> draft-deng-mip4-host-configuration to include the IP layer broadcast
> forwarding without DHCP relay on HA. It will be published soon.
>
> BRG
> Peny
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:04 AM, McCann Peter-A001034
> <pete.mccann@motorola.com> wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > Traffic on the list has been light lately so I wanted to
> > provide a status update on our existing work items and kick-start
> > a discussion on where to take the working group next.
> >
> > Here is a list of our current work items and status:
> >
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-generic-notification-message-07.txt
> >  New version was uploaded on 11/3, in response to comments
> >  from WGLC.  On cursory examination, it appears to me that
> >  most if not all comments have been addressed.  It would be
> >  nice to get confirmation of this from those who had comments
> >  back in July/August.  Then we can submit for publication.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-02.txt
> >  We will issue a last call on this soon, but it has lower
> >  priority than 2006bis.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-fa-03.txt
> >  No interest in continuing.  We will drop this item from our charter.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-07.txt
> >  Still working on the shepherd writeup.  Will be submitted for
> >  publication soon.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-udptunnel-mib-01.txt
> >  On hold waiting on 2006bis; then we will issue WGLC.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-rfc2006bis-05.txt
> >  Ready for last call.  Will issue soon.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-10.txt
> >  In RFC Editor's queue.
> >
> > draft-ietf-mip4-gen-ext-04.txt
> >  Ongoing discussion on whether to continue this item (see recharter
> >  discussion below).
> >
> >
> > Several new work items have come to our attention over the past
> > few meeting cycles.  Here is a partial list of potential work items
> > for mip4 going forward.  Please comment on which you would like to
> > see and which you think should be excluded.
> >
> >
> >
>  > draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
> >  We've had some good discussion already on the mailing list and this
> >  seems like a potentially useful extension.  Comments?
> >
> > draft-doswald-robert-mip4-btn-fmipv4-00.txt
> >  This was presented at IETF-72.  Is there interest in working on it?
> >  Other comments?
> >
> > draft-makela-mip4-nemo-haaro-03.txt
> >  This was presented at IETF-70 and it looks like there have been a
> > couple
> >  of revisions since.  Is there interest in working on it?  Other
> > comments?
> >
> > draft-acee-mip4-bulk-revocation-01.txt
> >  This was presented at IETF-70.  Is there interest in working on it?
> > Other
> >  comments?
> >
> > draft-yegani-gre-key-extension-03.txt
> >  This was presented at IETF-70.  Is there interest in working on it?
> > Other
> >  comments?
> >
> >
> >
> > If I left anything out please speak up.
> >
> > -Pete
> > --
> > Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
> >    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
> >     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> > Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
> >
> --
> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
>    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
>     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
>