RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document
Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Fri, 01 April 2005 15:47 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA06270 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:47:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DHOUX-00076d-Vc for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:55:27 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DHOHv-0002lT-Om; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:42:23 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DHOHt-0002lG-Id; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:42:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05935; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:42:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DHOPE-0006tZ-1B; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:49:57 -0500
Received: from esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (esdks002.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.121]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id j31FgBG00745; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:42:11 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:41:44 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.34 2004121512 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j31FfhqP026783; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:41:44 +0300
Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com 00UZphws; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:41:23 EEST
Received: from daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (daebh001.americas.nokia.com [10.241.35.121]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id j31FfKM23613; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:41:20 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.113]) by daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:40:46 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:40:45 -0600
Message-ID: <456943D540CFC14A8D7138E64843F8535BAD50@daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mip6] Consensus call on making IDdraft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document
Thread-Index: AcU2v5I6v6wC3vU1ROuQO8Y2kW4a4QADu+tQ
To: mip6@ietf.org, nemo@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2005 15:40:46.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BC01300:01C536D1]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A couple of clarifications regarding the consensus call: 1. The intention is to address the following scenario: "MIPv6 and NEMO capable Mobile hosts/routers attaching to an IPv4 access network need the capability to create a tunnel and be connected to their MIP6 home agents." This is the scenario that is most applicable for MIP6 deployment. There are plenty of other scenarios as well. But they are much more of academic interest at this time and hence not really in the scope of this discussion. So I would suggst that we do not go off on a tangent discussing all these other scenarios. Do you agree/disagree that the above scenario is the one that needs to be solved ASAP? (Note: It does not imply that other scenarios are irrelevant. It simply means that this is the scenario worth working on and has the most significant priority or value for MIP6 deployment.) 2. ID: draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel can be used as the baseline. It does not imply that we are ruling out draft-soliman-v4v6-mipv6 or any other. The IDs can be combined w.r.t the parts that address this scenario. Additionally once it is a WG document, what goes into the ID is decided by the WG. So lets not get into arguments of what or whose draft is the one that should be made the WG document. -Basavaraj _______________________________________________ Mip6 mailing list Mip6@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
- [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Carl Williams
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… James Kempf
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Pekka Savola
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pekka Savola
- RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Basavaraj.Patil
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Sri Gundavelli
- RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Alpesh
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pekka Savola
- RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Alpesh
- RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Sri Gundavelli
- RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Kent Leung
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Pekka Savola
- RE: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-waki… Ryuji Wakikawa