IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] 3 Work Areas - 1 WG

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2009 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE1E3A6B81 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ysbpa71wgMV1 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535063A6855 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so716709waf.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JTiYW26DJIoFIkzatDGuJJ9InR1m3lCxnI85TNoqDr8=; b=oONojtKO1v0VJhl+KOocxdLVB0p0qvZ+vN5MJiZxsRRonBCcNGZwtRHyqtTkEvv+cm 1VUWMZ3QRd/d7tauFpmyzOb5//xdqWWVW7l1uuiXov15zDIaKglWpIacVOsHOvIDZvw/ DXj1PUi+PjRxYBzFKYKTTFsyaWGP5Pms/hgNY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aj6oUWGm9VtnuCMqvgehfT5V5YCd5mIxAaLryqM9pf3KqETcM2HVdmsej0UUjMQy87 iUcObvALxcLHQmz+iRc0TzJhEXBQu5S/zYM1RUo1MMz8X64t08u/BWZKWLTPk5+cdkn+ pEV3t2vq0MFm8RKqU+TqTNNH8Ezt7E7x91+lg=
Received: by 10.114.198.1 with SMTP id v1mr1763635waf.78.1238191414381; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.10.111.233? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm346060pog.23.2009.03.27.15.03.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49CD4D35.2060108@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:33 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Heiner Wolf <wolf.heiner@googlemail.com>
References: <5f303cb80903271055o32e38029g6034c4ad346896c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f303cb80903271055o32e38029g6034c4ad346896c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3 Work Areas - 1 WG
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:02:40 -0000

Heiner Wolf wrote:
> B) LESS authors would work on remove simulation
> C) others would work on avatar interop
>
>   
Actually, LESS will need some kind of avatar interop to be useful, so 
those two goals could be merged (or maybe first do C and then B).

> Jon: this is not a free lunch for OGP with regard to display-simulator
> connections. There ought to be input from other worlds, especially
> other large VW biosystems like the Multiverse platform.
>
>   

I absolutely agree! It's too bad that there are only two technology 
bases represented in the discussion in this group.
With the weird relation that OpenSim is a separate code base, but one 
that was born as a reverse-engineering of the Second Life code base, and 
hence inherently mostly compatible.

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email