Re: [mmox] 3 Work Areas - 1 WG

[Dan Olivares <[e-mail]>]

I would suggest replacing 'code base', with 'client->server protocol'
since nobody looked at source.

I also note that OpenSimulator has a modular framework to which the
LLClient client plugin is just one of a few, but growing list of
compatible clients. :)

Sincerely

Dan


On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jon Watte <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Heiner Wolf wrote:
>>
>> B) LESS authors would work on remove simulation
>> C) others would work on avatar interop
>>
>>
>
> Actually, LESS will need some kind of avatar interop to be useful, so those
> two goals could be merged (or maybe first do C and then B).
>
>> Jon: this is not a free lunch for OGP with regard to display-simulator
>> connections. There ought to be input from other worlds, especially
>> other large VW biosystems like the Multiverse platform.
>>
>>
>
> I absolutely agree! It's too bad that there are only two technology bases
> represented in the discussion in this group.
> With the weird relation that OpenSim is a separate code base, but one that
> was born as a reverse-engineering of the Second Life code base, and hence
> inherently mostly compatible.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> jw
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>