IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] BUNDLE/SDP : ISSUE#3: Should BUNDLE deal with DECLARATIVE SDP ?

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 31 October 2013 04:52 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FE811E8246 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.451, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WeSVjw9N-Qa for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C21811E819C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so6864734wgh.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oGkr85JcANk3f+WTs291xAtshf47JjDynfqHQIjo7HA=; b=tSmdoNwtwjBZSbsJtWDdwTsBcTf/+EImsMVeY731PF/vVIevOhmPmXCoBg4zkx28y8 LZ9AJDEZckSA9Tu+4czWn8dYeeTWG/pijIg+G5tPrGfnoFH2fK7x1gqa75JEENqnutdM 4o62ixkNRexiLHvzUa6FArhd3clP4qLS0loQ4NTbovGQz5O7FQvBUXYYXrh9Qt1zt75L yc75SYbPkiffpJggc7LFzhVxDsAfpWmYWTTwJAg8e5aASByiE1uQTYrKaXoBwkUfreUV c5rW1Vnahi6GbKVCF59Y0SqnsiMcbN3cFxmLX1XTldRSjhK0IfsQKjDIMrSW+9X2uxkF DUSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.20.170 with SMTP id o10mr984159wje.4.1383195163245; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.178.231 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:52:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTGcejjWQCTZqyf-og4OwfM54HiCvoMSdYOPTZwpZ_eRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d5c825c43f304ea023834"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE/SDP : ISSUE#3: Should BUNDLE deal with DECLARATIVE SDP ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:52:46 -0000

Hello All

  Magnus raised an important question while analyzing  RFC6064 SDP
attributes related to RTSP SDP attributes for 3GPP.  Since these attributes
are declaratively used, SHOULD BUNDLE be dealing with specifying the
behavior in Non Offer/Answer Scenarios ?

If the answer is NO, we can assign category to be NOT IMPACTED for these
attributes,

If the answer is YES, i think there needs to be more discussions on
handling this scenario.

Please let me know your thoughts.


Cheers
Suhas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email