IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Thu, 08 August 2013 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB4411E8251 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0McAnlsSiE6u for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED5911E8227 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r78J0f7w010000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:00:41 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r78J0ekO012022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:00:40 GMT
Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r78J0eZJ021208; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:00:40 GMT
Received: from [10.1.21.34] (/10.5.21.34) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:00:40 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <5203E92A.4000509@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A2E37539-D134-4519-A6A8-C53AFCA65DA4@oracle.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C421C80@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <9AA75667-A597-4EB1-87B4-FA79A2F35C3C@oracle.com> <5203D7E7.4070207@nostrum.com> <E3966F35-5B9A-40F3-BFEF-FE97B6B09B5A@oracle.com> <5203E92A.4000509@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Cc: "mmusic (E-mail)" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:01:12 -0000

On Aug 8, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> You're proposing that "the UAS should send an SDP answer using port=0 for [bundle-only] m-lines", even if it wants to accept those m-lines. In other words:
> 
> 	• If the answerer wants to accept the m-lines, it does so by setting the port to 0
> 	• If the answerer wants to reject the m-lines, it does so by setting the port to 0
> 
> I'm having a hard time understanding how the recipient of the answer distinguishes between port=0 and port=0.
> /a

Sorry, yeah I figured out what you meant a few minutes later after reading Christer's email.  I just responded to that in my reply to him.

-hadriel
p.s. isn't email a fun medium for real-time chat?  :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email