Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Thu, 08 August 2013 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2788E21F9CD9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBsgr1TMz9VW for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3021F8528 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r78ILueL027115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:21:57 GMT
Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r78ILrKO027894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:21:55 GMT
Received: from abhmt116.oracle.com (abhmt116.oracle.com [141.146.116.68]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r78ILr46009023; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:21:53 GMT
Received: from [10.1.21.34] (/10.5.21.34) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:21:53 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <5203D7E7.4070207@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:21:51 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3966F35-5B9A-40F3-BFEF-FE97B6B09B5A@oracle.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C421C80@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <9AA75667-A597-4EB1-87B4-FA79A2F35C3C@oracle.com> <5203D7E7.4070207@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]
Cc: "mmusic (E-mail)" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE goes UP: Do we need port zero for bundle-only m- lines?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:22:11 -0000

On Aug 8, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 8/8/13 07:21, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>> What I think should happen is the UAS should send an SDP answer using port=0 for those same m-lines
> 
> Why? You're proposing that we remove the mechanism for rejecting media streams. Consider the example I put up during the meeting: you have a regular audio m-line and a bundle-only video m-line. The other end wants to decline the video. You've just taken away the tool for doing so.
> 
> There'd better be a heck of an upside to removing this critical protocol mechanism. So far, the upside you've described is "Hadriel thinks it's not aesthetically pleasing," which doesn't seem to be a very practical consideration. Is there a technically compelling argument for your position?

Huh?  You either misunderstood my email, or I'm not following your statement above.  I don't believe I'm proposing we remove the mechanism of rejecting media streams.  How/where/when did I propose that?  You lost me.

And I don't think what I'm suggesting is to be "aesthetically pleasing" either... although SDP-based ascii art might be kinda cool.

-hadriel