Re: [MMUSIC] Offer/Answer PT Questions

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 24 February 2016 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA211B3A0C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3whD-JEhXJuX for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AE31B39FE for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 9so50209465iom.1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6wmbmZHH0llAE5P7wiawu1oPAG9TqGVsWWVxGnhmHsA=; b=LsjcZunBY8LNz/sRcxdOxmNgDOXq4lXEU4SbSC61nnkSCgrUKd9ySh7xbT+lB/ivyE MaZp0H/s/zcpVxFdlVZvhdQuBLYRnK/jx8d1AJVqoIhsQxlPcKh6K0Tdwp2OS+bQKFiD IgYqSF2jA6kIFtCNzpfCDX08IDpremgosdRZNXsbdNn5J1YgNUSU0J8IgJZFtOBoiz7m T/bL5YtPGb7yxcp+0/cyeNA+tkdkTihvibe/8vYPf0wtOex1R3r/VgEtUpZJo7i2lpy7 HMmnVpre1xXHn7BQrpGK40X6i4+wiEi4qI1Gg3aXpZeeKRS979c31y8Ay+pj+c7iF5b5 LBdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6wmbmZHH0llAE5P7wiawu1oPAG9TqGVsWWVxGnhmHsA=; b=M0rzqGCiibaCNu35exJBJUnIOYgvkZM6DIdqd6tMJjpK0gz3eW308v8Y5UtQ/cBhAn oEytFHSX52castaF9Ynexmt0C4scbBWz1Rk+5DFdzvvFKGyZ6P56rNROjSg+Kce7Ok5u gEAwo3FgLapWGZGKOKSftJcGPOvBZE5dhPG0dpE09sbqmcv+Zj5H2JY+aM5fQd2fXA22 Wo4UsILKT3orlrlwlJKMIH+mRZqh5w3lyH8pHMqYcLL1iPwb6vhohtYuSZJx1C3MeHQZ bYm/J/X80GyZzZFmeBVxpZchP38oUvJclwwfj5S3B6LG3mY5FF87o8mNf4ENsY8R+qmb bo2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT1U0dUQGO/Xh3wtHYmQhRvy7lOzYiJZZv2tR8CBqEe/bvC2ZO+Z3jyDXOEV6aPoQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.164.145 with SMTP id d17mr37958952ioj.112.1456334851380; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com. [209.85.223.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 90sm1647244iod.12.2016.02.24.09.27.30 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z135so53890386iof.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.132.12 with SMTP id g12mr40721397iod.145.1456334842610; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.105.77 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:27:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <878u2ayqq6.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <CAD5OKxuV2Z_Ae18sGo5=pry4==jeBK22FtG_dKQfBh-1RjOdLQ@mail.gmail.com> <878u2ayqq6.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:27:22 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxseRk6tiaqswLNB5qGGQRus7L08N=vsUeM_pjEVU2G2UA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxseRk6tiaqswLNB5qGGQRus7L08N=vsUeM_pjEVU2G2UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, Martin Dolly <md3135@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ece60f7cfbc052c8760f5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/F6HZV46gE8Q9I8HkqrNGCkRAnJs>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Offer/Answer PT Questions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:27:56 -0000

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote:

> Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> writes:
> > 2. Is PT blocked from each direction independently or both directions at
> > the same time. For instance if A sent an offer with PT=100, but B never
> > sent an offer or an answer with PT=100, can B sent an offer with PT=100?
>
> My understanding is that the answer to 2 has always been understood to
> be that the PT number spaces in each direction are independent.  For
> instance, RFC 3264 section 5.1 notes
>
>       Different payload type numbers may be needed in each direction
>       because of interoperability concerns with H.323.
>
>
Based on this, the answer to original question is that if

1.Alice sends an Offer, with the following PT values:

PT 100: AMR-WB(mode-set=2)
PT 111: AMR-WB(mode-set=2, OA)
PT 0: PCMU

2.Bob sends the associated Answer:

PT 100: AMR-WB (mode-set=2)
PT 0: PCMU

3.Later Bob sends the following subsequent Offer:
PT 111: AMR(mode-set=0,2,5,7)

This offer should be accepted. PT is each direction is independent and Bob
is allowed to reuse it.

The complication here is that Alice will not be allowed to reuse PT 111
for AMR(mode-set=0,2,5,7) in the answer. Alice will need to pick a
different PT for AMR(mode-set=0,2,5,7), if it is supported and end points
will use asymmetric payload types.

_____________
Roman Shpount