Re: [MMUSIC] non-SIP ICE: useful or not?

Unfortunately I'm flying out Friday morning before the session, but I 
want to state for the record that:

- as a reload co-author, I find this work very useful.  If it doesn't 
exist elsewhere (here), I will have to write/update/maintain/edit much 
of the same information separately anyway.
- I believe that given that there are at least two existence proofs for 
interested audience now, and a strong likelihood of later audience, I 
believe even two drafts that don't have to do this separately justifies 
creating a common source for the same knowledge.
- therefore I support adding this as a work item for mmusic
- I am willing to do work to see this happen.

Bruce

Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> I'd like to get some discussion going around this question prior to the 
> meeting. Please take a look at:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-01.txt 
> 
> 
> The main question: is a draft like this sufficiently useful to produce 
> or not? Given its main audience are the (relatively few) protocol 
> designers of things using ICE, there is an argument to be made we don't 
> really need this. I'd especially welcome comments from Miika, Magnus, 
> Hannes and other folks actually producing documents that would use the 
> contents here.
> 
> Comments on details welcome too, though secondary I think to the main 
> question.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonathan R.

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic