Re: [MMUSIC] non-SIP ICE: useful or not?

My interest for non-sip ICE is for P2P video streaming.  We use RTSP
today and ICE conceptually sounds like a good idea.

However, as Magnus said one still needs the equivalent of a TURN/proxy
server for RTSP to use ICE.  This is probably not unique to ICE as
conceivably any other form of guaranteed P2P NAT traversal for RTSP
seems to need a proxy server as a last resort.

-Darren Loher
Chief Architect
Envysion, Inc.
http://envysion.com

> Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to get some discussion going around this question prior to the
>> meeting. Please take a look at:
>>
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-01.txt
>>
>> The main question: is a draft like this sufficiently useful to produce or
>> not? Given its main audience are the (relatively few) protocol designers of
>> things using ICE, there is an argument to be made we don't really need this.
>> I'd especially welcome comments from Miika, Magnus, Hannes and other folks
>> actually producing documents that would use the contents here.
>>
>> Comments on details welcome too, though secondary I think to the main
>> question.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonathan R.
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic