[MMUSIC] non-SIP ICE: useful or not?

Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com> Fri, 18 July 2008 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mmusic-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mmusic-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0221B3A6A7F; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5063A3A6A7F for <mmusic@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6JVrqI2H-AC for <mmusic@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF173A697F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,210,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="14681425"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2008 13:20:28 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6IDKRFq010771 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:20:27 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6IDKRCr016975 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:27 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:20:27 -0400
Received: from [10.82.248.28] ([10.82.248.28]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:20:26 -0400
Message-ID: <488098A2.9090200@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:20:34 -0400
From: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF MMUSIC WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2008 13:20:26.0971 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AF932B0:01C8E8D9]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=951; t=1216387227; x=1217251227; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jdrosen@cisco.com; z=From:=20Jonathan=20Rosenberg=20<jdrosen@cisco.com> |Subject:=20non-SIP=20ICE=3A=20useful=20or=20not? |Sender:=20 |To:=20IETF=20MMUSIC=20WG=20<mmusic@ietf.org>; bh=LPbY0bPk6LtkcgpSoITFeAxhphr7Tvg7MydZPVnMRi0=; b=ZzX7Kz0W3Q/G0cnTYHHX9MkOYq2JyU/PV4xlJyyfnmHOfMqb8RaoNvvS0i 0ae7W8kqxT7DprP6SNrg03p/9av1wq662r8CLwb9JhDWE8D/LrEqcwHbv7K7 ykFp/0LaXj;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=jdrosen@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Subject: [MMUSIC] non-SIP ICE: useful or not?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org

I'd like to get some discussion going around this question prior to the 
meeting. Please take a look at:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-01.txt

The main question: is a draft like this sufficiently useful to produce 
or not? Given its main audience are the (relatively few) protocol 
designers of things using ICE, there is an argument to be made we don't 
really need this. I'd especially welcome comments from Miika, Magnus, 
Hannes and other folks actually producing documents that would use the 
contents here.

Comments on details welcome too, though secondary I think to the main 
question.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.
-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow                                   Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
jdrosen@cisco.com
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic