Re: [MMUSIC] non-SIP ICE: useful or not?

Can you tell us why you think it is useful?
In what way did it help you?

Sumanth Channabasappa wrote:
>
> Find my thoughts inline (marked with [S])...
>
>  
>
>  
>
> I'd like to get some discussion going around this question prior to 
> the meeting. Please take a look at:
>
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-01.txt
>  
>
> The main question: is a draft like this sufficiently useful to produce 
> or not?
>
> [S] I think it is useful.
>
>  
>
> <snip>
>
>  
>
> Comments on details welcome too, though secondary I think to the main 
> question.
>
> [S] There are deployments where SIP-based architectures also plan (or 
> need) to support non-SIP clients. In such cases, it will be useful to 
> employ a single NAT traversal mechanism which will facilitate the 
> reuse of the existing infrastructure (with minimal changes).
>
>  
>
> - S
>
>  
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>   

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic