Re: [MMUSIC] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00.txt

["Elwell, John" <[e-mail]>]

Simo,

Thanks. However, there is no mention in the minutes about making it a work item. Furthermore, looking at the minutes for draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap it clearly states there was no consensus. In particular the minutes state some unanswered questions, including comparison of the ccap solution with re-using ICE. So I am interested in how we got from this very inconclusive situation to adoption of the present work item. I have been unable to find anything in the post-Stockholm mailing list archives or the Hiroshima minutes.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: 17 March 2010 11:59
> To: Elwell, John; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00.txt
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
> >Of ext Elwell, John
> >Sent: 17 March, 2010 10:40
> >To: [e-mail]
> >Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D 
> ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00.txt
> >
> >Can somebody please point me at the email thread that led to 
> adoption of
> >this as a work item?
> 
> Hello,
> This was discussed and adopted as WG item already in 
> Stockholm meeting. We had a long discussion with the authors 
> of draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap to align our work which is why 
> the submission as WG item comes so late.
> 
> Regards,
> Simo
> 
> >Thanks,
> >
> >John
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [e-mail]
> >> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of 
> [e-mail]
> >> Sent: 16 March 2010 22:15
> >> To: [e-mail]
> >> Cc: [e-mail]
> >> Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00.txt
> >>
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >> directories.
> >> This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia
> >> Session Control Working Group of the IETF.
> >>
> >> 	Title		: Miscellaneous Capabilities
> >> Negotiation in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
> >> 	Author(s)	: M. Garcia-Martin, S. Veikkolainen, R. Gilman
> >> 	Filename	: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00.txt
> >> 	Pages		: 17
> >> 	Date		: 2010-3-1
> >>
> >>    SDP has been extended with a capability negotiation mechanism
> >>    framework that allows the endpoints to negotiate transport
> >> protocols
> >>    and attributes.  This framework has been extended with a Media
> >>    capabilities negotiation mechanism that allows endpoints
> >> to negotiate
> >>    additional media-related capabilities.  This negotiation
> >> is embedded
> >>    into the widely-used SDP offer/answer procedures.
> >>
> >>    This memo extends the SDP capability negotiation 
> framework to allow
> >>    endpoints to negotiate a number of miscellaneous SDP 
> capabilities.
> >>    In particular, this memo provides a mechanism to negotiate media
> >>    titles ("i=" line for each media), connection data 
> ("c=" line), and
> >>    media bandwidth ("b=" line).
> >>
> >>
> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-misc
> >> -cap-00.txt
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >>
> >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> >> Internet-Draft.
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >mmusic mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>