Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft

I support this - I think it is desirable to have this behavior 
documented, since behavior similar to this is fairly widespread. 
Hopefully having it documented will help prevent gratuitous variation.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 10/28/12 5:43 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> MMUSIC followers,
>
> I would like to call for more opinions about this draft. It is hard for
> the chairs to evaluate the level of support of a draft when there is
> silence (except for Muthu).
>
> Opinions can be of the type "I support", "I believe we shouldn't work on
> this", or "I don't mind/care". All of them are very valuable to the chairs.
>
> So, please, voice your opinion about this draft.
>
> /Miguel
>
> On 27/10/2012 23:27, Emil Ivov wrote:
>> Well I certainly haven't been around long enough to know if there are
>> people who would have supported this but might have missed the mail.
>>
>> If you guys don't either, then maybe we can go back to the original plan.
>> IIRC, back in Paris Gonzalo had agreed to AD sponsor it. Is this still an
>> option?
>>
>> --sent from my mobile
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2012 2:09 PM, "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)"
>> <mperumal@cisco.com <mailto:mperumal@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I support it. I think it is quite informative.
>>
>>     Muthu
>>
>>     |-----Original Message-----
>>     |From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org>
>>     [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org>] On
>>     Behalf Of Miguel A. Garcia
>>     |Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:13 PM
>>     |To: mmusic
>>     |Cc: Flemming Andreasen (fandreas); Dan Wing (dwing)
>>     |Subject: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft
>>     |
>>     |At the last IETF meeting we had a presentation of the following
>> draft:
>>     |
>>     |http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-mmusic-latching/
>>     |
>>     |At that time, there was interest in adopting this document as WG
>>     item. We
>>     |currently have a milestone to submit an informational document
>>     describing
>>     |current practices in hosted NAT traversal, where this document fits.
>>     |
>>     |We would like to poll the working group to reconfirm the
>> consensus on
>>     |adopting the above mentioned draft as a working group item.
>>     |
>>     |If you support this work or have problems with the adoption of this
>>     |document as WG item, please indicate it by replying to this e-mail
>>     within
>>     |the next 5 days.
>>     |
>>     |     Miguel and Flemming (co-chairs)
>>     |--
>>     |Miguel A. Garcia
>>     |+34-91-339-3608 <tel:%2B34-91-339-3608>
>>     |Ericsson Spain
>>     |_______________________________________________
>>     |mmusic mailing list
>>     |mmusic@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
>>     |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mmusic mailing list
>>     mmusic@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>