Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft

[Enrico Marocco <[e-mail]>]

I want to second Paul on this. This draft describes a very common
behavior and having it documented will be useful. With a slight
preference for the WG stream -- the more the eyeballs the better.

Enrico

On 10/28/12 10:19 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I support this - I think it is desirable to have this behavior 
> documented, since behavior similar to this is fairly widespread. 
> Hopefully having it documented will help prevent gratuitous variation.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> On 10/28/12 5:43 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
>> MMUSIC followers,
>>
>> I would like to call for more opinions about this draft. It is hard for
>> the chairs to evaluate the level of support of a draft when there is
>> silence (except for Muthu).
>>
>> Opinions can be of the type "I support", "I believe we shouldn't work on
>> this", or "I don't mind/care". All of them are very valuable to the chairs.
>>
>> So, please, voice your opinion about this draft.
>>
>> /Miguel
>>
>> On 27/10/2012 23:27, Emil Ivov wrote:
>>> Well I certainly haven't been around long enough to know if there are
>>> people who would have supported this but might have missed the mail.
>>>
>>> If you guys don't either, then maybe we can go back to the original plan.
>>> IIRC, back in Paris Gonzalo had agreed to AD sponsor it. Is this still an
>>> option?
>>>
>>> --sent from my mobile
>>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2012 2:09 PM, "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)"
>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I support it. I think it is quite informative.
>>>
>>>     Muthu
>>>
>>>     |-----Original Message-----
>>>     |From: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>     [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] On
>>>     Behalf Of Miguel A. Garcia
>>>     |Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:13 PM
>>>     |To: mmusic
>>>     |Cc: Flemming Andreasen (fandreas); Dan Wing (dwing)
>>>     |Subject: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft
>>>     |
>>>     |At the last IETF meeting we had a presentation of the following
>>> draft:
>>>     |
>>>     |http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-mmusic-latching/
>>>     |
>>>     |At that time, there was interest in adopting this document as WG
>>>     item. We
>>>     |currently have a milestone to submit an informational document
>>>     describing
>>>     |current practices in hosted NAT traversal, where this document fits.
>>>     |
>>>     |We would like to poll the working group to reconfirm the
>>> consensus on
>>>     |adopting the above mentioned draft as a working group item.
>>>     |
>>>     |If you support this work or have problems with the adoption of this
>>>     |document as WG item, please indicate it by replying to this e-mail
>>>     within
>>>     |the next 5 days.
>>>     |
>>>     |     Miguel and Flemming (co-chairs)
>>>     |--
>>>     |Miguel A. Garcia
>>>     |[phone] <tel:%2B34-91-339-3608>
>>>     |Ericsson Spain
>>>     |_______________________________________________
>>>     |mmusic mailing list
>>>     |[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>     |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     mmusic mailing list
>>>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>