Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft

Well I certainly haven't been around long enough to know if there are
people who would have supported this but might have missed the mail.

If you guys don't either, then maybe we can go back to the original plan.
IIRC, back in Paris Gonzalo had agreed to AD sponsor it. Is this still an
option?

--sent from my mobile
On Oct 18, 2012 2:09 PM, "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <
mperumal@cisco.com> wrote:

> I support it. I think it is quite informative.
>
> Muthu
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Miguel A. Garcia
> |Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:13 PM
> |To: mmusic
> |Cc: Flemming Andreasen (fandreas); Dan Wing (dwing)
> |Subject: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft
> |
> |At the last IETF meeting we had a presentation of the following draft:
> |
> |http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-mmusic-latching/
> |
> |At that time, there was interest in adopting this document as WG item. We
> |currently have a milestone to submit an informational document describing
> |current practices in hosted NAT traversal, where this document fits.
> |
> |We would like to poll the working group to reconfirm the consensus on
> |adopting the above mentioned draft as a working group item.
> |
> |If you support this work or have problems with the adoption of this
> |document as WG item, please indicate it by replying to this e-mail within
> |the next 5 days.
> |
> |     Miguel and Flemming (co-chairs)
> |--
> |Miguel A. Garcia
> |+34-91-339-3608
> |Ericsson Spain
> |_______________________________________________
> |mmusic mailing list
> |mmusic@ietf.org
> |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>