Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Sun, 03 November 2013 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1C121E8133 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:28:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.539, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jofA1zrK-Evj for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACBD11E8252 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:28:05 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f2c8e000006d25-12-5276dc00e598
Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E5.AE.27941.00CD6725; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:28:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:28:00 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD8E110475; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:28:00 +0200 (EET)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C54EBB4; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:27:59 +0200 (EET)
Received: from dhcp-91d2.meeting.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF294EB9E; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:27:57 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <5276DC00.9030007@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:28:00 -0800
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <50D1FE75.9060709@nomadiclab.com> <CABkgnnWpPQsOKP-Yy-dytaTzENg8Q8UOsoAoEQMN0Qo4JSUrOw@mail.gmail.com> <5276DAFA.2000301@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnU2Lk-S2Om+0Qv0LDvbp97fq8HknPq71Fq+Qkg4FxU9dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU2Lk-S2Om+0Qv0LDvbp97fq8HknPq71Fq+Qkg4FxU9dg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjS7jnbIggzPb+C2unfnHaDF1+WMW ByaPnbPusnssWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj2Wq5gm9MFcemPWZuYFzC1MXIySEhYCKx dup2RghbTOLCvfVsXYxcHEICRxglDvdeYYJw1jNK9N+7wgLh7GGU2LqvEyqzllHi7517bHDO hZnTwIbxCmhLvJt5gwXEZhFQkbi66w3YQjYBW4nVr26CxUUFkiWeXbjODFEvKHFy5hOwuIiA rsSisw/Yuxg5OJgF1CWuLg4CCQsLmEs82rgGatd1oF3r1rCC1HAKBEpcP6UEUsMsYCGx+M1B dghbXqJ562xmiN/UJK6e2wRmCwmoSlz994pxAqPoLCSbZyFpn4WkfQEj8ypGjuLU4qTcdCOD TYzAwD+45bfFDsbLf20OMUpzsCiJ83586xwkJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgXFF bfOXaWWXXKLe5C21eFZuevBpU4I+35lz53lkinj7pZ44WmoWH4984PCPbYt1dcbHUP6dR+aY nH/t+ySxe2P2sQe7TM70hbNHrDBgNKl8un8z0/ngmM0n/6X8ncmrOYtZ73vi/PiH3/8bdgXX zV58R/NG/SPtQH+nHwumno6Y5ingeeik01olluKMREMt5qLiRAAnbe16SgIAAA==
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:28:14 -0000

On 11/3/13 3:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 3 November 2013 15:23, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Good point. How about if there's no application data to send before the NAT
>> bindings time out?
>
> Why did you want to use ICE then? :)

Preemptive ICE in order to minimize setup delay? A corner-case of a 
corner-case? :)


Cheers,
Ari