Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 11 April 2019 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155F21201B1; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXhpBfu2KMrp; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C32120048; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ewa_guest_internet_sthlm_nat2.ericsson.net ([192.176.1.97] helo=[10.148.125.253]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1hEYc2-0003E1-Ug; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:15:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18CDB5D4@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:15:24 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6186A0F4-D36A-48BC-9522-95D81D7814F1@kuehlewind.net>
References: <155448109368.10029.4766956503581760917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18CDB5D4@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
To: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1554984930;7a82340d;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1hEYc2-0003E1-Ug
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/ftQtX-BU7wZQzIEDQVaIVayrj7w>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draf?= =?utf-8?q?t-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:15:32 -0000

Hi Roni,

Yes, I think more or less repeating the text from the RTCweb doc could be useful here.

Mirja



> On 11. Apr 2019, at 11:50, Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> Thanks
> 
> See inline
> Roni
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] 
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 7:18 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org; Bo Burman; mmusic-chairs@ietf.org; bo.burman@ericsson.com; mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for quickly addressing the comments from the TSV-ART review regarding interactions with SCTP (and thanks Micheal T. for the review!)!
> 
> One minor, more editorial comment on max-time parameter:
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol says "This life-time starts when providing the user message to the protocol stack.". While a reference to draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol is given respectively, I would recommend to also clarify in this draft which time frame is meant given this time frame includes and end-to-end delays.
> [RE] are you suggesting to repeat the text from the RTCweb document " A user message will no longer be transmitted or retransmitted after a  specified life-time given in milliseconds in the 'max-time' parameter. The life-time starts
>         when providing the user message to the protocol stack."
> 
> 
> As a side note: not sure it is necessary to expand IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) (see sec 5.2) in an IETF RFC but the RFC editor might tell you...
> [RE] will remove
> 
>