IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Model-t] draft-thomson-tmi

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C918F3A0BA6 for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xvBnQnW-IMMd for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856873A0BA9 for <model-t@iab.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id s9so22449106lfs.4 for <model-t@iab.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 07:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NnNY6Fha/ZNhVoBfJELCZTD9UICu/cko6Sc/i2lgTaA=; b=PCk/f1TFWn72uCsp5n3FSFebKp+2cFy7TUmnDrhIXyr8McS0x0Gf8kDzVMNyf7uT2g InvuQNy8pyecUQdWrC5aoLG0f/muA2xfAR1dP5eqUsDCBwPh/qgj6sDLy89mM0kKIb0M c++uwC0i6JIssS7g20wWCK5v2/KtHMA+GR+TmaepbsJCm0WzcKk6jsJM0QDxHMjK3Mun BP3XJyn+AWctWXFcO3sNjG1u8XyVVbhqXIX4a/smRecM6X4svMLsZUaY93xg+3LbxBxs kmznLXb8k3KySrRsEV1kK0mJdO+bH0zSbiLy/jQxMOJZ6HWr0IVwoTy/pqSlTthi6/8h 5CJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NnNY6Fha/ZNhVoBfJELCZTD9UICu/cko6Sc/i2lgTaA=; b=ThBRv87n4iFFyIInBQ/njC7x3CqOpaQCk2JGs3Y99yzSqAK8wmX3eJlXBNbSdVEWij oGN6Zfw/LIdy9LJ/K7OVkGmMhIH2UYY6w0oUrSnGGjpjylpmU2299dzClUOxpX9juR27 uPb7kXVBmthnFi91skREXhQOQxrhY346yK0RFcp40hJZUgkqBSmUctKRufdVATiZRAcX oihD+qXGi48WPN5dpeCVNMidgMko5NycZRQ4/3tiZjmG0gs3nVoqNLHuo3VjrkyRBqgI r6oIcSRmXL6p6ABWr/NYfpYSb68FeFVpVjT1hVC4P9RqT7uwMClNYOgJrwaFibohAzZy jyxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tlXJagfMXrAQNEhi4JYvL5N0HoIKe0G6o1ea2bv07A/rtWQuW g+IKI2ifiCt3VHqTZBU7O191YXd6Jftstul+qJKv6Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0ackTOXj/G6a0oaWWzw5KYWNkcV33rvWif+zUhWMMUTcbX06haK4P86dHP9RHiyYpCMtP+ntIag8r4616kEg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3156:: with SMTP id s22mr11046639lfi.140.1596549686427; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 07:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <422978b2-028d-48e1-85ed-ddaa36e36052@www.fastmail.com> <8CE6F9A3-FD01-4C09-AD10-C5FA5ECCDB9D@piuha.net> <480d483c-fddd-4480-ab8b-6368bdb2c5b0@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <480d483c-fddd-4480-ab8b-6368bdb2c5b0@www.fastmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 07:00:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPZiXAUJqo1Gv3NmB6K1-GKy_EQ-r+u96tZxqrT2YcKRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, model-t@iab.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ed1dad05ac0db021"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/model-t/esoBhf6d4g1bcTg8wt8QfABu2TM>
Subject: Re: [Model-t] draft-thomson-tmi
X-BeenThere: model-t@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of changes in Internet deployment patterns and their impact on the Internet threat model <model-t.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/model-t/>
List-Post: <mailto:model-t@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:01:34 -0000

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:09 AM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020, at 02:01, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
> Translation services are more directly intermediaries.  But I'm not sure
> what you mean exactly there.  Protocol translation is often accomplished by
> intermediaries anyway.  It's rare to have protocol translation as a pure
> service, though it could in theory operate differently.  (Human language
> translation services are different: it offers a way to intermediate that
> doesn't involve intermediation in any real sense, it's only when you move
> to real-time interpretation that you introduce an intermediary.)
>

Note that Web protocol translation is not typically done by an
intermediary. Rather, the client sends it to a service, as recommended in
your draft.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email