Re: [Mops] AD review of draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons-09

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2022 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41E63A1945; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 03:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqMDbMTsW6xW; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 03:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766D23A1943; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 03:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id u198so7689014vsu.10; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 03:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jtW6nn6GG+HzNuFF53WlSSv8TE3iT9DUHmnnDRZppeM=; b=gVRewH3RZ3dmb4tuZ5Oj9fbi09mnokAiTjRpIbZtFaJhrs9Pg9fYbGBi6+uh5C2mrs MRviIpfuk5ym9jdQ/u6vlpFwSInBDjQoTTX4I0NJbnfSR6tc16TjKFWzUyNqTxqbYqPY 5mIpKpuSfOGFyImCw/cnEHLsK303XcsXOqRBoFfYEwBKhWniizC5MpG51WHV+D7BCdgR mWpOU2yUIUdIydyK82YCyvxWWjKvFfgttS3FjO9Xs2ieY8h0Adirw6Lr0KNDvM2A/H8R qWOIAIiRCrbBP+iltktxx3/IH+Bi+CAplnMP3/xFjMm0cgwtEk8OrSMn3qRWzGOFmivl UzKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jtW6nn6GG+HzNuFF53WlSSv8TE3iT9DUHmnnDRZppeM=; b=NdfQyj7QPCFdPiB0pYGZpmz88wBMxN69wmkhridy7CjStkgLi1DAIXIhcfWZNYZyQI kp6sZJtAhchJYF+4lLBUhCkyXgE7QrI6DV8LYSsd9VnC9zEWomWEJ7sDooFgohd5BRb9 iKE5U5cjAdyO8TmBboMMUpHPEiZ9HjNQcPC+5el7nGolZZilHOennrHwIjZl4CPW02Tz KkOu6sHWDyqm84o4fkKXGbmxKUyemqjtIkAzwELKi7GTPOlamktlbvjK1MNHmiPG9xPl H79ugyL9C2jV9Gs5ddAguc5ugQjsjBE0KGsXq2F62uGwXgs4QdoSooJJ93o3MDnurm+T cAHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QConKkRBWJXyX2QVEHCPP6VpcYI/JDPgJ0S/XZb68c/dFeJOW CrKP8OGn3uskjAozhG8fHl5zm0wNMmrnpdeqKUX3gxbsck4rpg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9Z4U8qqfECkilvFOjHPgy5Rv308qTr9SKVzMgkTFJf3TMSfSsVmcB2Ap428ce2y9QdRqKcwbtq76TwBoGFi0=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd8f:0:b0:324:ef68:9f60 with SMTP id k15-20020a67fd8f000000b00324ef689f60mr3102567vsq.29.1647859559924; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 03:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <07ECD0EE-48C5-4F5A-B871-4B7DE3B2777A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <07ECD0EE-48C5-4F5A-B871-4B7DE3B2777A@cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:45:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cOgPPMajTmJHKeRUT7=uDTEbbJB_JPzu3Gwp4cpoGcuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: mops-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: MOPS Working Group <mops@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5890e05dab833e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/LGHSc6yuZkmb6BX2BRSSzRI8v1c>
Subject: Re: [Mops] AD review of draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons-09
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:46:06 -0000

Dear Kyle and Leslie,

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 9:23 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> As usual, before going to the next publication step (the IETF last call),
> I do my own AD review. Sorry for this belated review but "just in time" for
> the MOPS meeting at IETF-113 ;-)
>
trimmed down to

> While I am not an expert, I am surprised by the acceptable latency
> numbers, I would have written 100 msec for videoconference and "couple of
> seconds" for streaming live events. Video streaming (netflix like) is
> indeed several seconds. But, I am trusting the authors on their statement.
> Section 4.2 explains a little more those numbers so a forward reference to
> section 4 would be beneficial.
>

I think I know what to do with all the other AD review comments, but I'd
like for us to take a moment or two, while we have hybrid face to face time
today, to talk about that one.

I have my own opinions, but this is a WG draft, and the editors shouldn't
make post-publication request changes just to reflect Spencer's opinions.

(Really, anyone's opinions, but especially not mine!)

Best,

Spencer