Re: [Moq] Reminder: Minutes from IETF 114 MoQ BoF

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 August 2022 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B39C1522CE for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEeaZ9eyvnN0 for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A039C14CE42 for <moq@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id p184so7386394iod.6 for <moq@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=YR3RdzuvWwMUhQu9kcnMZPE2BeqXFngbvWu/rB3asxE=; b=goHjYY+1PZjMtjoTJ9iCjLxqD+5uetPhJmucOCPoe8couhDh2hHhTGmme7zK9LVPS2 eFGXhfdBpfVfWqbc6jQ7THKqTaPkQBgcxueXnCqe/2aFOiRQm1JOjIqrKOJU15CqGyo+ 5B+NA18AazQ1ffvZ4nznVYfwRBvTQpYAfq1Vr8rUQDfvAqr5sl+cWPdVbigCx0bwtK+5 V2piYB77gN+AGk21RHM8RWOfcfQ6EXnaGe/aOSXSf8q0Ec9fRermsb3JyCpufs7uU8S3 RSb4q594hjQmw/PgmOP+/folKcd6xiWKoRa0yDCvjrW+PykZWZWM0OzSWHfbKuSk8a5c L3Tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=YR3RdzuvWwMUhQu9kcnMZPE2BeqXFngbvWu/rB3asxE=; b=yO7xW49ipxhUuRibCrCrC/w5Mo3RV88qdF9c933mWGIXgLtfz+ezW/gOGIVTzjSlYW gdxmdwZtVlaTD9AEWFT5k6fvwqkbegITJh0WgRP/DM+AXevMZAc1zGZmwK5UBxbtkE80 B/V2oYQM3L+yBC1pFcaiXLUGNDREzYmWPtxH96swnibbpCwrXgt61QHr+RD2DLv8qFo1 vWwoxMkTJnzftwDWU7GqxoRZiGITjzHqV+si7AIEJaHVExhn3a2EsamQ4r4bZLuzM4WR jI5plq7OVZ8Jm/9rw1f8f88SkHVnWywQWVHTxLUekvn0tW9vFbOI7UNgqAgC/93Zny7R yI7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo35XpAkXI3oV/KznBEUO+VyzQp8uMDmi90ZhqNajvuVG8zbFxSX EmDOOmGIFoXVM76DlAcpI99CBMWsI0O55RDcstA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6stju5hkHoPMh9Dv7Xipfwm+IAZD3IBkBRYQZzrkuCAiyPArnC/VihmdmUYNgj4Vf6Y43VU3NId35Y041ycZE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:4184:b0:346:b62c:f17b with SMTP id az4-20020a056638418400b00346b62cf17bmr3214886jab.101.1660747358613; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8FD7627F-9035-4ED2-BC10-FBDAB59AE89C@fb.com> <CA+9kkMDfSB_4ZuHWzOE7qbwE0jJ=S1fKzjidQYELPiyVNCR74A@mail.gmail.com> <D79DB79E-62B5-4B99-BB96-BF1E59A69170@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <D79DB79E-62B5-4B99-BB96-BF1E59A69170@stewe.org>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:42:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMB-zEOvddruFo=83SSy+_iFsve72-YbZj6KO65iTLN2+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
Cc: Alan Frindell <afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f362805e670e0dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/moq/9onmKLPI181bkqOtpDoKNbnPewA>
Subject: Re: [Moq] Reminder: Minutes from IETF 114 MoQ BoF
X-BeenThere: moq@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media over QUIC <moq.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/>
List-Post: <mailto:moq@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:42:40 -0000

Hi Stephan,

The raw minutes have this text:

The charter should specify a mandatory to implement media format, either on
a use case specific basis or generally?
Yes 20 No 63 All 83
No consensus but trending toward No.

Would including this text meet your needs?

regards,

Ted Hardie

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:18 PM Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> wrote:

> HI chairs,
>
> So not to lose that valuable information: can you please add the result of
> the show of hands against mandatory to implement media formats?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Moq <moq-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ted Hardie <
> ted.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 02:23
> *To: *Alan Frindell <afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc: *MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Moq] Reminder: Minutes from IETF 114 MoQ BoF
>
>
>
> We plan to turn in the minutes on August 17th, at the end of the business
> day; are there any proposed corrections?
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:44 PM Alan Frindell <afrind=
> 40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Media over QUIC BoF
>
> IETF 114
>
> Chairs: Alan Frindell and Ted Hardie
>
>
>
> After a review of the Note Well, the group reviewed the proposed charter
> and proposed several changes, which were accepted by those in the room and
> formed the basis for the BoF questions.  Given below are the outcomes of
> those questions.
>
>
>
> 152 total participants
>
>
>
> 1. Does the community think that the problem statement is clear,
> well-scoped, solvable, and useful to solve?
>
>
> Yes: 80
> No: 10
> All: 90
>
>
>
> 2. Can I see a show of hands of folk willing to review documents (or
> comment on the mailing list) if a working group is formed?
>
>
>
> Yes: 62
> No: 9
> All: 71
>
>
>
> 3. Does the community think that given any charter revisions discussed
> during the BOF (subject to review and finalization on the mailing list), a
> WG should be formed?
>
>
>
> Yes: 90
> No: 4
> All: 94
>
>
>
> 4. For anyone who does not think a WG should not be formed, do you wish to
> address the BoF explaining your concerns?
>
>
>
> No one joins the queue.
>
> 5. Does the AD have any questions or concerns
>
>
> No
>
>
>
>
> A list of the changes to the charter adopted during the BoF can be found
> here <https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-charter/commits/main/charter.md> (see
> commits on 27 July).
>
>
>
> A link to the raw minutes of the meeting can be found here
> <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-moq>.  Please report any
> corrections to the chairs.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Alan and Ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Moq mailing list
> Moq@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>
>