Re: [Moq] Minutes from IETF 114 MoQ BoF

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

Hi Spencer,

My apologies for the delay in replying; I took some vacation after the
IETF.  Murray has already put the charter into the process, which means he
asked the IESG if the charter is ready for external review.  There are some
comments from the IESG that are already there (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/moq/about/).

I did not receive any BoF notes from members of the IAB,

best regards,

Ted Hardie

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:18 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear Alan and Ted,
>
> Two quick questions.
>
> The sense of the room was that the charter, as amended in PRs in realtime,
> was a reasonable charter to put before the IESG for approval.
>
> Two questions:
>
>    - When do you plan to tell Murray that the charter is ready to request
>    IESG review and approval?
>    - The IAB procedures for "IAB Member Roles in Evaluating New Work
>    Proposals
>    <https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2012-2/iab-member-roles-in-evaluating-new-work-proposals/>" describes
>    BOF coverage reports sent by IAB members *to the IESG, copying the
>    IAB. IAB members providing BOF coverage may also send BOF evaluation
>    reports to BOF chairs, other BOF proponents, or the BOF community of
>    interest, if that seems helpful*. Were any BOF coverage reports for
>    the MOQ BOF submitted by IAB members?
>
> Thanks for your clues.
>
> Best,
>
> Spencer
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 8:44 AM Alan Frindell <afrind=
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Media over QUIC BoF
>>
>> IETF 114
>>
>> Chairs: Alan Frindell and Ted Hardie
>>
>>
>>
>> After a review of the Note Well, the group reviewed the proposed charter
>> and proposed several changes, which were accepted by those in the room and
>> formed the basis for the BoF questions.  Given below are the outcomes of
>> those questions.
>>
>>
>>
>> 152 total participants
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Does the community think that the problem statement is clear,
>> well-scoped, solvable, and useful to solve?
>>
>>
>> Yes: 80
>> No: 10
>> All: 90
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. Can I see a show of hands of folk willing to review documents (or
>> comment on the mailing list) if a working group is formed?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes: 62
>> No: 9
>> All: 71
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. Does the community think that given any charter revisions discussed
>> during the BOF (subject to review and finalization on the mailing list), a
>> WG should be formed?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes: 90
>> No: 4
>> All: 94
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. For anyone who does not think a WG should not be formed, do you wish
>> to address the BoF explaining your concerns?
>>
>>
>>
>> No one joins the queue.
>>
>> 5. Does the AD have any questions or concerns
>>
>>
>> No
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A list of the changes to the charter adopted during the BoF can be found
>> here <https://github.com/moq-wg/moq-charter/commits/main/charter.md> (see
>> commits on 27 July).
>>
>>
>>
>> A link to the raw minutes of the meeting can be found here
>> <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-moq>.  Please report any
>> corrections to the chairs.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Alan and Ted
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Moq mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>>
> --
> Moq mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>