Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc

[Sam Aldrin <[e-mail]>]

Strong Yes for adoption.
Lot of enhancements went it, via various RFC’s, which makes RFC4379 an incomplete document for MPLS OAM.
Hence this bis is very much essential and long overdue.

-sam
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a three week (because of the holiday season) poll
> to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
> as an MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([e-mail]). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures directly against draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis document. However, there are IPR disclosures against
> RFC 4379.
> 
> We have started an IPR poll in parallel to the adoption poll.
> 
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
> 
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
> and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the
> MPLS wg list or any IETF mailing lists.
> 
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
> working group should continue progress the document, regardless of
> an existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
> 'support/do not support' when responding to working group adoption
> calls and last calls.
> 
> This working group adoptiom poll ends January 8, 2016.
> 
> /Loa
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]