IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> Sat, 19 December 2015 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0D81A8A74; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OqzI7RfHjaE; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E1E1A8A72; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id q3so55578837pav.3; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:cc:to; bh=aStWbI9SH5ST/85qmC9GOIG3Hmey+Gf6gMg0Uv7aZHs=; b=FTrNcODbxMqTakKFOPRs/WAipIz8YGTcbLAIN8VY3P1fvziGFpo3Hcy7T7JlrMMbOu 94G1MUUyf8XXOMiq/QQOTRC0ro5iao1TnXxN+z/81QBOqPYb1fu5KWSKEd2eOQDScbME 8x3ielMKh78WvfXmw8t9zyi33fFOxcC4ifwgIzRWmHe6aqsfzZqWFclu4P125HepRKjE +CIF8XJZn5TkuITxz8JhWd8I3wbRIYQ5PYPS84kw43wNE+ttNJA7iB2eCP+dzTTj4sJC vH0Ucqev6HVakHWVswd4ITaXBR4UD+o+3yNndR+xDL5y5zc/1FYV9n4TY1p/8i5Ke02R sogw==
X-Received: by 10.67.5.69 with SMTP id ck5mr13895781pad.125.1450539696466; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (75-37-192-227.lightspeed.lsatca.sbcglobal.net. [75.37.192.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yl1sm29087717pac.35.2015.12.19.07.41.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:41:34 -0800
Message-Id: <DDD37723-0535-41D2-A66E-13B89913FDF5@gmail.com>
To: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13B143)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/uae1Rp8IoCHW2IsgfFu9Kdsumz4>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org" <draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:41:38 -0000

On Dec 19, 2015, at 05:50, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I meant to say:
> 
>    Wouldn't that make sense to move *everything around it* forward to FS too?

There are criteria for taking things to FS (which I myself have to review). That said, the authors of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis have gone through the *everything around it* and indicated (as our best guess) which documents will be folded in, and which are not mature enough to become Internet Standard. 

I'm sure the chairs and ADs will chime in; if any on the list have evidence of readiness (implementation and/or deployment), please share it with the list or the chairs. 

Kireeti 

>    =E2=80=94Tom
> 
> 
>> On Dec 19, 2015:8:48 AM, at 8:48 AM, Nadeau Thomas =
> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>> =20
>> =20
>>    Wouldn=E2=80=99t that make sense to move forward to Full =
> Standard too?
>> =20
>>    =E2=80=94Tom
>> =20
>>> On Dec 19, 2015:8:44 AM, at 8:44 AM,

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status