[mpls] Closed - new wg document - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 08 January 2016 05:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29FF1ACDB7; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:25:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCJ9x0GDnDAo; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu []) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1331ACDB8; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00C28180137F; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:25:25 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <5674E8EF.80807@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <568F4840.5090507@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:25:20 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5674E8EF.80807@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/5OK-H5bkY4_79phRySlvHpaMWYg>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org" <draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Closed - new wg document - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:25:31 -0000

Working Group,

This poll is closed and we have a new working group document.

Can the authors please post the draft as draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis-00,
without any other changes than file name, version and dates.


On 2015-12-19 13:19, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> This is to start a three week (because of the holiday season) poll
> to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
> as an MPLS working group document.
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> There are no IPR disclosures directly against
> draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis document. However, there are IPR disclosures
> against
> RFC 4379.
> We have started an IPR poll in parallel to the adoption poll.
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
> and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the
> MPLS wg list or any IETF mailing lists.
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
> working group should continue progress the document, regardless of
> an existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
> 'support/do not support' when responding to working group adoption
> calls and last calls.
> This working group adoptiom poll ends January 8, 2016.
> /Loa