[mpls] Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 06 August 2015 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C211A0338 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9h8aqZdFAQG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A35B1A0231 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8403118013BE; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55C31BF7.9040304@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:33:59 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <55C22B0A.6000704@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <55C22B0A.6000704@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2MBG2RawTBTcwM7o2Y_UzaeFZTY>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 08:34:07 -0000

Folks,

One of the authors of the document has found an error with the text
of the IPR Poll mail, thanks Nagendra! When you respond to the IPR poll
please respond to this mail (nothing bad will happen if you respond
to the original mail :) ).

The correct text should be:

Working Group,

We have started to prepare draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for
working group adoption poll (can I use the abbreviation wgap?)

We will start with the IPR poll and then MPLS-RT and the poll.

This mail starts the IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-
lsp-ping?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There no IPR disclosures filed against this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


/Loa
mpls wg co-chair