Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Wed, 19 August 2015 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51AD1A88D9 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvDjAaEfnqK7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0118.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CAFE1A88D1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1429.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.107.151) by BY1PR0501MB1205.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.104.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.231.21; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:50:40 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.107.152) by BY1PR0501MB1429.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.107.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.231.21; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:50:37 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.107.152]) by BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.107.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0231.024; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:50:37 +0000
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10
Thread-Index: AQHQ2q/vIdYnHDOIHE27EBWeyjASvA==
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:50:36 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR0501MB143027AE5BC3673C2579B7E1A5670@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY1PR0501MB143041FD755CA2819623985EA5180@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BY1PR0501MB1430CED3726DFB4949F67074A5770@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0501MB1430CED3726DFB4949F67074A5770@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rcallon@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0501MB1429; 5:RfUfKRSskZhu8ZKIp9WpTKlc8QbFWbZ8ZRk+aXzJ2BpvaWPawMK9xkLes/jUT0ixqQ7X5OkG8I5trBdZ4ZCDovqGOvnKxKqMlut7/e6+v0g8+S/qyQ5OhU+Jwb8ZKO+BknoQRi4kXVlSIjcsqxrPvA==; 24:LHGjek4fffVgId67/TgiK0nVfK8nsc5BrBdamN7T3vjGeUFrXMXEILdEMKsNnhnfeKxRmxMtp0A/c7eEVcYWidHVhN76f7vIT/GyazIIkoM=; 20:uFGnAhpRXRHhps4jph2k7TS+2hXysF6kJ7YzLauU9eshBa7kQaHHmB6E/Q3i1Ziao/9ryAKUWewbRwOSDXSZsA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1205;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR0501MB14294F814F77F30D0C3995D4A5670@BY1PR0501MB1429.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429;
x-forefront-prvs: 0673F5BE31
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(164054003)(74316001)(2501003)(40100003)(101416001)(5003600100002)(2656002)(68736005)(19609705001)(122556002)(16236675004)(92566002)(19625215002)(230783001)(64706001)(62966003)(102836002)(189998001)(15975445007)(77096005)(66066001)(2950100001)(33656002)(76576001)(2900100001)(5002640100001)(76176999)(18717965001)(50986999)(87936001)(19300405004)(19580395003)(19580405001)(10400500002)(86362001)(77156002)(106116001)(106356001)(97736004)(5001830100001)(54356999)(81156007)(5001770100001)(46102003)(5001960100002)(105586002)(4001540100001)(5001860100001)(99286002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429; H:BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY1PR0501MB143027AE5BC3673C2579B7E1A5670BY1PR0501MB1430_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Aug 2015 18:50:36.8832 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1429
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0501MB1205; 2:Dy4AQ1lTVMyW1dHSsyh0oCSnpkT9vVUQSuQBdYjF5x9YA+is++OEQ1POKFJSfcae4NhIlOexpvMzQRdeeAuSKg8pWjPO1EFgRy04ehXxVK0AcASzUely/nsidVkmjpJfoc4ZQ2bQa/PoSBEhUz28/9c8rXP/gYJprVzyEPLNubk=; 3:AJ9H25m8iYoVYk/gvUT4glCb8YuaBM74hiZAPGzmbMawlAqDSiNwdomh/SruR/U5DZHueNZO4SpqEZ4zetdGDT8r25zih3CC/bK8ShAZ74P6d5DOKgLBLH0D5+c1irUxGQWRHbugorxJRFpDJdX+Ug==; 25:6+MTKJChq3JJFquYXrPxAsraJwm/C2ld0+TFOVZCiVLD3WeFWNo2r37y5Fx54/2VgNWh1AP7xNIOzzP3DqdP5ZExYiwfW7npLO8fEtGcTn+bYxWt1s1XU7QHr/YzPezbYFp+qeJ7yLcWLHFLFkxeiQwp+kAVXOcgP4M5Dq49vM2/Ih8GlDGq6g16epmuB2xgtlODzNrOw5bqF+krtO2T01KRN/dXwJU8Wt7GYjcV19IUUixrazi6Ko9kxO8o3CAUhwgbXun56nhD+FFvVMpTUA==; 23:q9T39GbzKupDsIylnUCdUNSxNauM+vweb55GQNN6CkCZftOKWeqBRTP9G0R/Wh9U+i0J2FwaaysJEcxl7LZ4/74AhOKf30TX6oCWAZRyem1YES/YAg3n3EHfJ3hfKEjrCzot7CXprczBQ4fp9tnG34Jho/kJL/3nBc2c9C9/spSMDH5BKh7I9BuZg41+I0uI
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/5Y5Z70Wo6-WpUMPYDcz3xxhInaA>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:50:45 -0000

This working group last call has now been completed, with sufficient support and with no opposition. However, there were some comments received. I also see that the authors have already worked on producing an update to address the comments.

Authors, when you are ready please post the updated draft to address the comments received, and then I will proceed with submitting the document for publication.

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS wg co-chair)

From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 11:45 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10

Working Group,

This is to initiate a two week working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10.

Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).

There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors have stated that they
are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft (two of the responses were private to
the WG chairs).

This working group last call ends Tuesday  August 18, 2015.

The previous WGLC for this document failed due to a lack of response, even though there were
no objections. I will remind the working group that for a WGLC a lack of response does not imply
support; rather a lack of response implies either no opinion or a failure to read the document. As
with any WGLC, working group participants are requested to read the document and comment,
and if you feel that the document is ready for publication it is appropriate to respond to any WGLC
with a short and simple email indicating support.

Ross
for the MPLS WG chairs