Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10

Ross,

I've read the draft, and I agree with the authors that it is ready for
publication. It's been improved since the previous WG LC. My only comment
is that the reference to draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext should be
updated to RFC 7487, which is something the RFC Editor would do anyway.

Thanks,
Andy

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
>
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-10.
>
>
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
>
>
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors have
> stated that they
>
> are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft (two of the responses
> were private to
>
> the WG chairs).
>
>
>
> This working group last call ends Tuesday  August 18, 2015.
>
>
>
> The previous WGLC for this document failed due to a lack of response, even
> though there were
>
> no objections. I will remind the working group that for a WGLC a lack of
> response does not imply
>
> support; rather a lack of response implies either no opinion or a failure
> to read the document. As
>
> with any WGLC, working group participants are requested to read the
> document and comment,
>
> and if you feel that the document is ready for publication it is
> appropriate to respond to any WGLC
>
> with a short and simple email indicating support.
>
>
>
> Ross
>
> for the MPLS WG chairs
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>