Re: [mpls] FW: I-D Action: draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt

Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> Sun, 12 January 2014 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4891AE02A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:06:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4X6cn1f5W08e for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [41.87.104.245]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E4A1ADE84 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>) id 1W2Jo4-0007E5-2Z; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:20 +0200
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Organization: SEACOM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:19 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; )
References: <23487.1389288863@erosen-linux> <52CEEB4F.2010609@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <52CEEB4F.2010609@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3418644.7xQfiLWAjj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201401121406.19381.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [mpls] FW: I-D Action: draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:06:36 -0000

On Thursday, January 09, 2014 08:32:47 PM Stephen Farrell 
wrote:

> Are those widely used? I'd be interested to know. If not,
> then this tool as another tool in the toolbox may be of
> use.

Folk like Adva, Tejas and others have encryption at the 
optical layer. I'm not sure how well this scales in service 
provider deployments, but I know enterprises have been 
lapping it up.

The fastest data rates I've seen being encrypted at the 
optical layer are 10Gbps.

Mark.