Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce-03

[Lizhong Jin<[e-mail]>]

Hi Ross,
Looks fine for me now.

Thanks
Lizhong
 

Ross Callon <[e-mail]> wrote 2012/10/03 01:51:36:

> For the three MPLS-RT reviewers of draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-
> reduce, and for anyone on the MPLS email list who has commented on 
> this draft, can you check the update and see whether the recent 
> update of the draft (draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce-04, posted 
> September 1) addresses your issues? 
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> _____________________________________________
> From: Ross Callon 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:50 PM
> To: Markus Jork; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Ross Callon; Martin Vigoureux; 
> Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal); Giles Heron; Thomas Nadeau
> Subject: MPLS-RT review of draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce-03
> 
> 
> Markus, Lizhong, Thomas;
> 
> You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
> draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce-03
> 
> Note to authors: You have been CC’d on this email so that you can know 
that 
> this review is going on. However, please do not review your own 
document. 
> 
> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
> the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether 
the 
> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t have 
to
> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start). 
> 
> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and 
secretary,
> and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent 
> privately to only the WG chairs. 
> 
> Are you able to review this draft by August 3, 2012 (ie, the end of the 
IETF 
> meeting in Vancouver)? We understand that this is somewhat short notice 
and 
> that you might have something else to do the week of the IETF, so let us 

> know if you need slightly more time. 
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> (as MPLS WG chair)
> 
> PS: I noticed that Tom Nadeau’s email address listed in the draft is
> out of date. This email is being CC’d to his updated address. 
>