Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

"Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com> Tue, 21 December 2010 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521933A69BC; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:23:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RygrknXwRIPT; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CE43A67B6; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:23:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oBL8P4NH024352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:25:04 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oBL8P0YZ024869; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:25:03 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.57]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:24:41 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBA0E8.8377A813"
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:24:40 +0100
Message-ID: <62D9AC1F11702146A0387CBFF3A8CD3D031721DF@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
thread-index: AcucminHtskEUJUqgkmKr74A1f6wOQETkw2Q
References: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
From: "Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2010 08:24:41.0728 (UTC) FILETIME=[83FA8000:01CBA0E8]
Subject: Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:23:19 -0000

Yes/Support

 

 

 

From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ext George Swallow
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:54 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

 

Folks -

We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay
to cover more general MPLS applications.  In discussions among the
authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all
involved to split the document into two.
One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms
and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.

Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed
workgroup documents as 
draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.

This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup
drafts.  

A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.

A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being
added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.

The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC.

George and Loa