Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com> Wed, 22 December 2010 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <mach@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0EF3A6AA6; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:56:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OztZ4fC3eO6j; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB143A6918; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LDT002OC1CPZ1@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:58:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from c55527 ([10.110.98.60]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LDT00JGQ1CNTY@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:58:01 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:57:56 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
To: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Message-id: <670D62EDB44244F88D814AB88FF531F8@c55527>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:56:16 -0000
Support. Mach -------------------------------------------------- From: "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:53 AM To: <mpls@ietf.org>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org> Subject: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts > Folks - > > We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay > to > cover more general MPLS applications. In discussions among the authors > and > co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to > split the document into two. > One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms > and > one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. > > Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup > documents as > draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. > > This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup > drafts. > > A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. > > A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added > to > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. > > The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC. > > George and Loa > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-tp mailing list > mpls-tp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp >
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Linda Dunbar
- [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Luyuan Fang (lufang)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Agrahara Kiran Koushik
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts jordan.britnell
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Tim Wu (timwukp)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Scott Mansfield
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… wei.hongbo
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts binny jeshan
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow