Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> Thu, 16 December 2010 22:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ldunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501303A6A00; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:56:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QB4EEnb4893K; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796C53A69FA; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LDJ00MPJMGHEF@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:57:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from L735042 ([10.124.12.108]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LDJ005FAMGHUU@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:57:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:57:53 -0600
From: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
To: 'George Swallow' <swallow@cisco.com>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Message-id: <011201cb9d74$abcfca80$0c00a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_pHssQGooeommgV6AyVc12w)"
Thread-index: AcucminHtskEUJUqgkmKr74A1f6wOQA2nypQ
References: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:56:09 -0000
Support. Linda Dunbar _____ From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of George Swallow Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:54 PM To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org Subject: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Folks - We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications. In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two. One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts. A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC. George and Loa
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Linda Dunbar
- [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Luyuan Fang (lufang)
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Agrahara Kiran Koushik
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts jordan.britnell
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Tim Wu (timwukp)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Scott Mansfield
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… wei.hongbo
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts binny jeshan
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow