Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)
Yoshinori Koike <koike.yoshinori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Wed, 22 February 2012 04:22 UTC
Return-Path: <koike.yoshinori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6236021F88A0 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:22:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.06
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.06 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4hR7kbRCxivQ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D1321F889F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.144]) by tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1M4MnuD004273; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:22:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A5AE008D; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:22:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from imail3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (imail3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.5.248]) by mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B32FE008A; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:22:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [129.60.11.43] (koike-pc.nslab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.11.43]) by imail3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1M4MmBT023886; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:22:48 +0900
Message-ID: <4F446E48.8000303@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:25:44 +0900
From: Yoshinori Koike <koike.yoshinori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls@ietf.org, ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int
References: <4F327811.1000700@pi.nu> <4F3E8461.9070002@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4F3E8461.9070002@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:22:50 -0000
Hi, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- hitless-psm. Best regards, Yoshinori(co-author) (2012/02/18 1:46), Loa Andersson wrote: > All, > > this poll has been running for some time, according the process the > wg chair outlined in a recent mail it should have been preceded > by a mail reminding about IPRs. We didn't have that process really > in place when the poll was started. So here comes the IPR remeinder. > > As you can see from the poll the wg chairs have sent out the authors > have asked for draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm to be > considered for adoption as a WG document. We would like to check > whether there is IPR on the document that needs to be disclosed. > We will weigh this in when we judge the consensus on the call for > adoption. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- > hitless-psm? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF > IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response > has been received from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > /Loa > > (as MPLS WG co-chair) > > > > On 2012-02-08 14:26, Loa Andersson wrote: >> Working Group, >> >> this is to start a two week poll to see if there is support to make >> >> draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-04 >> >> mpls working group drafts. >> >> Pleased send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list >> (mpls@ietf.org). >> >> This poll ends February 22, 2012! >> >> Loa >> for the mpls wg chairs >> >> > -- Yoshinori Koike koike.yoshinori@lab.ntt.co.jp
- [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitle… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… zhang.fei3
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Rolf Winter
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… HUANG Feng F
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Satoshi UENO
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… masahiko.mizutani.ew
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Zhenlong Cui
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Andrew G. Malis
- [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Wa… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Manuel.Paul
- [mpls] Simultaneity of multi-level HPSM (Re: Poll… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Satoshi UENO
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: Addition on this poll … Loa Andersson