Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 02 March 2012 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E0421F8C18 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:28:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aM2XbrLzjaL for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:28:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2200921F8C16 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60C262A8002; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:28:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F5092A8.8000600@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:28:08 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, "draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm@tools.ietf.org" <draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm@tools.ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <4F327811.1000700@pi.nu> <4F3E8461.9070002@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4F3E8461.9070002@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:28:16 -0000
All, this poll has ended. We have good support to make it a working group document, however we will wait until we hear from all authors regarding whether all IPR they are ware of has been disclosed before we request that the document be posted as a working group document. /Loa for the MPLS wg co-chairs On 2012-02-17 17:46, Loa Andersson wrote: > All, > > this poll has been running for some time, according the process the > wg chair outlined in a recent mail it should have been preceded > by a mail reminding about IPRs. We didn't have that process really > in place when the poll was started. So here comes the IPR remeinder. > > As you can see from the poll the wg chairs have sent out the authors > have asked for draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm to be > considered for adoption as a WG document. We would like to check > whether there is IPR on the document that needs to be disclosed. > We will weigh this in when we judge the consensus on the call for > adoption. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- > hitless-psm? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF > IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response > has been received from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > /Loa > > (as MPLS WG co-chair) > > > > On 2012-02-08 14:26, Loa Andersson wrote: >> Working Group, >> >> this is to start a two week poll to see if there is support to make >> >> draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-04 >> >> mpls working group drafts. >> >> Pleased send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list >> (mpls@ietf.org). >> >> This poll ends February 22, 2012! >> >> Loa >> for the mpls wg chairs >> >> > -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13
- [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitle… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… zhang.fei3
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Rolf Winter
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… HUANG Feng F
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Satoshi UENO
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… masahiko.mizutani.ew
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Zhenlong Cui
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls] Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-h… Andrew G. Malis
- [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Wa… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Manuel.Paul
- [mpls] Simultaneity of multi-level HPSM (Re: Poll… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Yoshinori Koike
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Satoshi UENO
- Re: [mpls] Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: Addition on this poll … Loa Andersson