Re: [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 06 March 2012 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9505F21E80B1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:20:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c+aza3ydCnPG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06FD21E808C for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 751292A8002; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:20:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F55C8DF.80200@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:20:47 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, "draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm@tools.ietf.org" <draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm@tools.ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <4F327811.1000700@pi.nu> <4F3E8461.9070002@pi.nu> <4F5092A8.8000600@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4F5092A8.8000600@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: Addition on this poll - the IPR aspect (Was Re: Poll on draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:20:54 -0000

Folks,

this poll has ended with good support to make the draft a working group
documents, and we have received the IPR statements from all co-authors.

We have a new working group document!

Can the authors please republish the document as

draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-00

without any other changes than date and filename.

/Loa
for the mpkls wg co-chairs


On 2012-03-02 10:28, Loa Andersson wrote:
> All,
>
> this poll has ended. We have good support to make it a working
> group document, however we will wait until we hear from all
> authors regarding whether all IPR they are ware of has been
> disclosed before we request that the document be posted as
> a working group document.
>
> /Loa
>
> for the MPLS wg co-chairs
>
> On 2012-02-17 17:46, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> this poll has been running for some time, according the process the
>> wg chair outlined in a recent mail it should have been preceded
>> by a mail reminding about IPRs. We didn't have that process really
>> in place when the poll was started. So here comes the IPR remeinder.
>>
>> As you can see from the poll the wg chairs have sent out the authors
>> have asked for draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm to be
>> considered for adoption as a WG document. We would like to check
>> whether there is IPR on the document that needs to be disclosed.
>> We will weigh this in when we judge the consensus on the call for
>> adoption.
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-
>> hitless-psm? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF
>> IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>> IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response
>> has been received from each author and contributor.
>>
>> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>> /Loa
>>
>> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2012-02-08 14:26, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> this is to start a two week poll to see if there is support to make
>>>
>>> draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-04
>>>
>>> mpls working group drafts.
>>>
>>> Pleased send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list
>>> (mpls@ietf.org).
>>>
>>> This poll ends February 22, 2012!
>>>
>>> Loa
>>> for the mpls wg chairs
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                              +46 767 72 92 13