[mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 05 June 2015 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9B01B2CAB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lN5w3S4EqqV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8161B2CA8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6444518013E6; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:15:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55714C7C.80509@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:15:08 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
References: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Sjhb6APrCFSMRz4VAVvPf-pOb1M>
Subject: [mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:15:14 -0000

Working Group,

This has been closed. We have a new working group document.

Could the authors please post the document as
draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-00
without any other changes than the administrative information,
file name, version number and dates.

/Loa
for the mpls wg chairs

On 2015-05-20 11:55, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-
> ping-06 as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the
> authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware of
> any undisclosed IPRs against this document.
>
> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
> aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
> this is now.
>
> This poll ends June 5, 2015.
>
> /Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64