IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document

Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net> Thu, 28 May 2015 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rtorvi@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DE31B2B7C for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9LPpXUTUy_7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0736.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F1C1B2B76 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1310.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.130.151) by DM2PR0501MB1311.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.130.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.172.22; Thu, 28 May 2015 01:47:16 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1310.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.130.151]) by DM2PR0501MB1310.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.130.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0172.012; Thu, 28 May 2015 01:47:16 +0000
From: Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
Thread-Index: AQHQkuMu9hbBta/+l0mrUDBhExs+F52QEV2AgACKHwCAAATDgIAACm4T
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 01:47:16 +0000
Message-ID: <8995D06A-93EB-4C27-8315-C6FC52C65B03@juniper.net>
References: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571818AD@dfweml701-chm> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE083375E1@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9AA772@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9AA772@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rtorvi@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [24.218.20.33]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1311;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0501MB131167E1E0CB9F672C19A4D6D0CA0@DM2PR0501MB1311.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520003)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1311; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1311;
x-forefront-prvs: 0590BBCCBC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(51704005)(189002)(164054003)(51444003)(24454002)(199003)(13464003)(62966003)(77156002)(102836002)(40100003)(64706001)(66066001)(36756003)(230783001)(97736004)(2900100001)(68736005)(5001830100001)(2950100001)(92566002)(101416001)(122556002)(93886004)(46102003)(86362001)(50986999)(99286002)(105586002)(106116001)(87936001)(2656002)(54356999)(76176999)(83716003)(5001960100002)(106356001)(81156007)(19580395003)(110136002)(4001540100001)(82746002)(189998001)(5001860100001)(5002640100001)(33656002)(19580405001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1311; H:DM2PR0501MB1310.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 May 2015 01:47:16.4926 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0501MB1311
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fB5OETTdv4A9e4Scb7Ntt7G4AOQ>
Cc: "draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 01:47:38 -0000

As a co-author, I support this draft  for WG adoption.
Thanks,
Ravi

> On May 27, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> I believe that the document addresses practical use case and offers reasonable solution. The document have been improved and I think that now is ready for WG adoption.
> 
>    Regards,
>        Greg    
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:56 AM
>> To: mpls@ietf.org; draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org;
>> mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting 
>> draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
>> 
>> Working Group,
>> 
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-
>> ping-06 as an MPLS working group document.
>> 
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working 
>> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation 
>> for your support/not support, especially if you think that the 
>> document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>> 
>> There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the 
>> authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware 
>> of any undisclosed IPRs against this document.
>> 
>> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and 
>> aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email