IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-02

"Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com> Thu, 04 September 2014 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EAD1A6F70 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZK29h8AIOCN for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518F41A6F10 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4596; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409788842; x=1410998442; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=vA6TK2ssoIvk1aZHACcf9xCJ87g/9iPaHn6DWKuP2wM=; b=I8JUEFnlJwHkxiEarwKYmiQaJv9PtBYzhNC+kg2gs8xIV/A4Wk89749e fgDQnCk13pOVI891poBCJnGdI1LSmu72tky6FxDbvyWxP66zrUJDCCCXK Qyr1uBWNZw3OtkaPw8NVciBmCzTkwTmdQgd+ykN8d7+/LmfOGwePBKkiD s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAJuqB1StJA2G/2dsb2JhbABZgkdGgS7QIQGBDBZ3hAMBAQEEJwZBCxACAQgECgMDAQIoBzIUCQgCBAENBYhCvi4BF488EQeETAWPHoIUiyuVHoNhbIFIgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,461,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="352418652"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2014 00:00:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8400fTs027783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:00:41 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.10]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:00:41 -0500
From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-02
Thread-Index: AQHPx9NE9t8SC8sHsE2irSizJfKcPg==
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:41 +0000
Message-ID: <D02D1CE9.12FF17%tsaad@cisco.com>
References: <e4da58f21f34427686e7385f90354ec1@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <e4da58f21f34427686e7385f90354ec1@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.239]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D02D1CE912FF17tsaadciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/i2VU0izbdqjktwOedvFEE2qhQMA
Cc: "'mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org'" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:44 -0000

I support this draft.

The proposed new LSP ping/trace reply mode is useful for the initiator to indicate the response to come back on the reverse LSP path (without additional path TLV).
The ordered list of reply modes is also useful as a flexible (per request) list of reply modes to be visited when otherwise the response may fail if the only requested reply mode becomes invalid— hence this extension decreases chance of false failures.

Minor comment in section 1:
to minimizes -> to minimize

Regards,
Tarek

From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net<mailto:rcallon@juniper.net>>
Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 at 11:20 AM
To: "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
Cc: "'mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:'mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>'" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-02

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-02
as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group
mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).

This poll will end Thursday September 4, 2014.

Thanks, Ross

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email