Re: [Mtgvenue] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1AC1310B4; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 19:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71rSerW7aWRO; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 19:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB0C131090; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 19:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.83] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w572vVWm090476 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 21:57:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.83]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <2A6327A6-676E-4F92-96A9-9B5EA4E9708C@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E5A9F29A-733C-44A7-9F89-9D4C774B14C4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 21:57:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <48022095-180B-4F01-AFDA-027D4AE673E4@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process@ietf.org, mtgvenue-chairs@ietf.org, mtgvenue@ietf.org
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <152831160427.6203.1032347954466946223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <48022095-180B-4F01-AFDA-027D4AE673E4@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/xVMMA0oXnzG6RzpO1rgZZva9r7E>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 02:57:37 -0000

Thanks for the quicl response. Your answer for the 3.2.3 and 3.3 mismatch is is perfectly reasonable.

Ben.

> On Jun 6, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> I think the 3.2.3/3.3 mismatch is strictly editorial: I believe the intent was to have them both use the 3.2.3 language.
> 
> Other editorial points noted. Thanks.
> 
> pr
> 
> On 6 Jun 2018, at 14:00, Ben Campbell wrote:
> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: Yes
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks for this. Most of my comments are already covered, but here's a few:
>> 
>> Substantive:
>> 
>> §3.2.3 and §3.3: The first section says that the cost of "open and unfiltered
>> internet" in public spaces and guest rooms in "typically" included in the room
>> price. But the latter simply says they are included.  Is that the intenti? It
>> seems odd for the overflow hotels to be held to a higher standard than the
>> meeting hotel.
>> 
>> Editorial and Nits:
>> 
>> §1, 2nd paragraph: " the IASA to apply their " - Plural disagreement. (It looks
>> like a mix of the US English tendency to treat organizations as singular
>> entities and the British English tendency to treat them as plural collectives ).
>> 
>> §7: The last sentence seems disconnected from the rest of the paragraph; I
>> suggest a separate paragraph.