Re: [Mtgvenue] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the quicl response. Your answer for the 3.2.3 and 3.3 mismatch is is perfectly reasonable.

Ben.

> On Jun 6, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Pete Resnick <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> I think the 3.2.3/3.3 mismatch is strictly editorial: I believe the intent was to have them both use the 3.2.3 language.
> 
> Other editorial points noted. Thanks.
> 
> pr
> 
> On 6 Jun 2018, at 14:00, Ben Campbell wrote:
> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: Yes
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks for this. Most of my comments are already covered, but here's a few:
>> 
>> Substantive:
>> 
>> §3.2.3 and §3.3: The first section says that the cost of "open and unfiltered
>> internet" in public spaces and guest rooms in "typically" included in the room
>> price. But the latter simply says they are included.  Is that the intenti? It
>> seems odd for the overflow hotels to be held to a higher standard than the
>> meeting hotel.
>> 
>> Editorial and Nits:
>> 
>> §1, 2nd paragraph: " the IASA to apply their " - Plural disagreement. (It looks
>> like a mix of the US English tendency to treat organizations as singular
>> entities and the British English tendency to treat them as plural collectives ).
>> 
>> §7: The last sentence seems disconnected from the rest of the paragraph; I
>> suggest a separate paragraph.